CVE-2025-62631
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn insufficient session expiration vulnerability [CWE-613] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4.0, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions allows attacker to maintain access to network resources via an active SSLVPN session not terminated after a user's password change under particular conditions outside of the attacker's control
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a session management vulnerability (CWE-613) in FortiOS where SSLVPN sessions remain active and valid after a user's password has been changed. An attacker who previously obtained valid session credentials can continue accessing network resources through the persistent session even after the legitimate user's password has been updated, unless specific conditions (likely session termination policies or re-authentication triggers) are met.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.4.0, < 7.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiOS versionRun `get system status` or `get system info` via FortiOS CLI and locate the Firmware/Version fieldAffected if Version is >= 6.4.0 and < 7.4.1
-
Verify SSLVPN is configuredRun `get vpn ssl settings` via FortiOS CLI and check if SSLVPN is enabled (look for 'set status enable' or similar)Affected if SSLVPN is enabled and the FortiOS version falls within the affected range
-
Review active SSLVPN sessionsRun `get vpn ssl monitor` via FortiOS CLI to list currently active SSLVPN sessionsAffected if There are active sessions and the FortiOS version is in the affected range, as these sessions could remain valid after a password change
You are affected if your FortiOS version is >= 6.4.0 and < 7.4.1 and you have SSLVPN enabled, as password changes will not automatically terminate existing SSLVPN sessions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.1
Apply the Fortinet patch when available and consider manually terminating active SSLVPN sessions or enforcing re-authentication policies when user password changes occur as an interim control.
FortiOS 7.4.1 or later (7.4.x branch recommended)
- 1. Back up the current FortiOS configuration to ensure a rollback point is available
- 2. Download FortiOS 7.4.1 or later from the Fortinet Customer Support Portal
- 3. Upload the firmware image to the FortiGate device via the web UI or CLI
- 4. Initiate the firmware upgrade and allow the device to reboot
- 5. After reboot, verify the SSLVPN session terminates properly after a user password change by testing the scenario
- 6. Confirm the new firmware version is running with 'get system status' CLI command
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62631 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62631 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data