CVE-2025-63535
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Blood Bank Management System 1.0 within the abs.php component. The application fails to properly sanitize usersupplied input in SQL queries, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary SQL code. By manipulating the search field, an attacker can bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Blood Bank Management System 1.0's abs.php component allows attackers to inject arbitrary SQL code through the search field. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in SQL queries, enabling authentication bypass and unauthorized system access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Blood Bank Management System versionLocate the application and identify its exact version number. Check for version files, about pages, or headers that display the software version. Common paths may include the application root directory or admin panels.Affected if The installed version is Shridharshukl Blood Bank Management System 1.0
-
Locate abs.php componentSearch the web server document root for the file abs.php. This file is the vulnerable component containing the SQL injection flaw.Affected if The file abs.php exists in the application directory structure
-
Verify search functionality is accessibleAccess the application and locate the search field that interfaces with abs.php. This is the entry point for the SQL injection payload.Affected if A search input field that submits to abs.php is available and functional
-
Check for unsanitized SQL parameter usageReview the abs.php source code and examine how the search parameter is incorporated into SQL queries. Look for direct string concatenation of user input into query statements without parameterized queries or input sanitization.Affected if The search parameter is used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements, escaping, or input validation
The environment is affected if running Shridharshukl Blood Bank Management System version 1.0 with the abs.php component present and the search feature accessible without sanitization in the code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all SQL queries in abs.php, particularly those handling search field input. Validate and sanitize all user inputs before incorporating them into database queries.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-63535 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-63535 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data