CVE-2025-64446
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA relative path traversal vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 may allow an attacker to execute administrative commands on the system via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA relative path traversal vulnerability in FortiWeb allows attackers to execute administrative commands via crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests. The vulnerability affects multiple version ranges (7.0.x through 8.0.x) and is exploitable remotely without authentication given the critical CVSS score.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.12>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.12>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.10>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.5>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiWeb firmware versionLog into the FortiWeb CLI and run: `get system status` or check in the web UI under Dashboard > Status. Alternatively, check from FortiGate/FortiManager if centrally managed.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 7.0.0 to 7.0.11, 7.2.0 to 7.2.11, 7.4.0 to 7.4.9, 7.6.0 to 7.6.4, or 8.0.0 to 8.0.1
-
Verify administrative interface exposureCheck if the FortiWeb admin web interface (HTTP/HTTPS port 80/443 or custom admin port) is reachable from untrusted networks. Review firewall policies and network ACLs protecting the management interface.Affected if The administrative interface is accessible from the internet or from untrusted internal networks without IP restrictions
-
Review allowed IP configurationIn FortiWeb web UI, go to System > Admin > Administrators and check the Trusted Hosts setting for each admin account, or run `show system admin` in CLI to review trusted host definitions.Affected if Administrative accounts lack trusted host restrictions (0.0.0.0/0 is configured) or trusted hosts do not cover only your management stations
You are affected if your FortiWeb version is below 7.0.12, 7.2.12, 7.4.10, 7.6.5, or 8.0.2 AND the admin interface is accessible from untrusted networks without IP allowlisting in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.127.2.127.4.10
Apply vendor-supplied patches to upgrade FortiWeb to patched versions; as a temporary measure, restrict management interface access to trusted networks only.
Upgrade to FortiWeb 7.0.12, 7.2.12, 7.4.10, or 7.6.5 (or later) depending on your current version branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiWeb version using the web UI (System > Status) or CLI: 'get system status'
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version branch (7.0.x -> 7.0.12, 7.2.x -> 7.2.12, 7.4.x -> 7.4.10, or 7.6.x -> 7.6.5)
- 3. Download the corresponding firmware upgrade file from Fortinet's support portal (support.fortinet.com) after authenticating
- 4. Back up the current FortiWeb configuration via the web UI (System > Maintenance > Backup & Restore) or CLI: 'execute backup full-config'
- 5. Upload the firmware file via System > Maintenance > Firmware or via CLI: 'execute restore firmware'
- 6. After the device reboots, verify the upgrade was successful: 'get system status' to confirm the new version number
- 7. Verify the vulnerability is remediated by confirming the installed version is >= 7.0.12, 7.2.12, 7.4.10, or 7.6.5 respectively
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-64446 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-64446 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data