CVE-2025-6619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE 6.2c.884. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setUpgradeFW of the file upgrade.so. The manipulation of the argument FileName leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical OS command injection vulnerability exists in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE firmware 6.2c.884 in the setUpgradeFW function within upgrade.so. The FileName parameter is not sanitized before being passed to system calls, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by injecting shell metacharacters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.2c.884CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelCheck the device label, web interface, or SNMP to confirm it is a TOTOLINK CA300-PoE deviceAffected if Device is not a TOTOLINK CA300-PoE, then not affected by this specific CVE
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the device web interface (typically http://192.168.0.1) and navigate to System Status or Firmware Upgrade to view the installed firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is exactly 6.2c.884, then the device is vulnerable
-
Verify the upgrade.so module existsCheck the device firmware by examining /lib/upgrade.so or similar paths via telnet/ssh if available, or compare firmware file contentsAffected if The upgrade.so library with the setUpgradeFW function exists on the device, the vulnerability is present
-
Confirm device is network accessiblePing the device IP and verify the web management interface is reachable on ports 80/443Affected if The device management interface is exposed to untrusted networks, the command injection can be exploited remotely
-
Check for external exposureReview firewall rules and network boundary devices to determine if the device management interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is accessible from the internet or untrusted VLANsAffected if The device is directly accessible from the internet or untrusted networks, it is at highest risk of exploitation
A TOTOLINK CA300-PoE device running firmware version 6.2c.884 with its management interface exposed to the network is affected by this command injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedThis device is end-of-life with no vendor patch available. Organizations should replace the device with a supported model or implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict all access to the device management interface.
Latest available CA300-PoE firmware from TOTOLINK (verify version > 6.2c.884)
- 1. Visit the official TOTOLINK support website at www.totolink.net to check for firmware updates
- 2. Locate the CA300-PoE product page and download the latest available firmware version
- 3. Access the device web interface and navigate to the firmware upgrade section
- 4. Upload and apply the new firmware version following the manufacturer's instructions
- 5. After upgrade, verify the firmware version displayed matches the expected fixed version
- 6. Consider changing administrator credentials as a precaution since command injection may have allowed credential compromise
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data