CVE-2025-67163
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Simple Machines Forum v2.1.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload into the Forum Name parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Simple Machines Forum v2.1.6 allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript or HTML into the Forum Name parameter. The payload persists in the database and executes when users view the affected forum, potentially compromising session cookies or performing actions on behalf of authenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Simple Machines Forum versionAccess the admin panel or check the version file (typically version.php or similar in the installation root). Look for the version number displayed in the admin dashboard under Forum or Maintenance sections.Affected if Your installed version is exactly 2.1.6 (the affected version).
-
Examine stored Forum Names for malicious contentAccess the admin panel, navigate to the Forum or Boards management section where Forum Names are configured. Review each forum's name for unusual characters, HTML tags, or script elements.Affected if Any Forum Name contains HTML tags such as <script>, <img>, <iframe>, or JavaScript event handlers like onload, onerror.
-
Query the database for XSS payloads in forum-related fieldsIf you have database access, examine tables related to forums (such as smf_boards or similar). Look for Forum Name fields containing patterns like <script, javascript:, onload=, or encoded equivalents.Affected if The database contains Forum Name values with script injection patterns or encoded HTML.
-
Verify if affected forums are accessible to usersNavigate to the forum index or board listing as a regular user. Visit each forum to see if the Forum Name renders and triggers any behavior.Affected if When viewing forums, you observe unexpected popups, alerts, or the page source reveals unescaped HTML in the Forum Name.
You are affected if you are running Simple Machines Forum version 2.1.6 AND have a Forum Name that contains unsanitized HTML or JavaScript code, which would execute when users view the forum.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch or upgrade to a fixed version; implement proper input validation and output encoding for the Forum Name parameter to prevent script injection.
Simple Machines Forum 2.1.7 or later (latest 2.1.x stable release)
- 1. Backup your Simple Machines Forum database and files before making any changes.
- 2. Download the latest stable version of Simple Machines Forum (2.1.x series) from the official source at www.simplemachines.org.
- 3. Extract the upgrade package to a temporary directory on your server.
- 4. Disable your forum through the forum administration panel or by renaming the index.php file temporarily.
- 5. Upload the new files, overwriting the existing installation while preserving your configuration and attachments.
- 6. Run the upgrade.php script by accessing it via your browser (e.g., yourdomain.com/upgrade.php).
- 7. Follow the on-screen upgrade instructions to complete the process.
- 8. Re-enable your forum and verify the Forum Name field now properly sanitizes input.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-67163 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-67163 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data