CVE-2025-6956
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Campcodes Employee Management System 1.0. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file /changepassemp.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Employee Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands through the unprotected 'ID' parameter in /changepassemp.php.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed application versionLocate and examine the application files or admin interface for version information. Check README files, headers, or the application's 'About' page for version = 1.0.Affected if The application is Campcodes Employee Management System version 1.0 exactly.
-
Verify the vulnerable file existsLocate the file changepassemp.php in the web application's directory structure. Common paths may include /admin/, /employee/, or the root web directory.Affected if The file changepassemp.php exists in the web application deployment.
-
Confirm network accessibility of the endpointAttempt to access the URL path /changepassemp.php via HTTP/HTTPS request from an authorized testing position. This is a remote SQL injection, so the endpoint must be network-reachable.Affected if The /changepassemp.php endpoint responds to HTTP requests (even with an error or redirect).
-
Test for unsanitized ID parameter handlingSend a crafted request to /changepassemp.php with the ID parameter set to a simple SQL injection test string such as ' OR '1'='1. Observe whether the application returns database errors or exhibits unexpected behavior indicating the input is not being parameterized.Affected if The application exhibits SQL errors or logical anomalies when the ID parameter contains SQL syntax, indicating the input is not being sanitized or parameterized.
If the application is Campcodes Employee Management System version 1.0 and the /changepassemp.php endpoint is accessible and processes the ID parameter without sanitization, the environment is affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for the ID parameter and apply input validation; deploy vendor patch when available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6956 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6956 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data