CVE-2025-69983
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFUXA v1.2.7 allows Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the project import functionality. The application does not properly sanitize or sandbox user-supplied scripts within imported project files. An attacker can upload a malicious project containing system commands, leading to full system compromise.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFUXA v1.2.7 contains a critical RCE vulnerability in its project import functionality. The application fails to sanitize or sandbox user-supplied scripts embedded in imported project files, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary system commands and achieve full system compromise by uploading malicious project files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.2.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed FUXA versionCheck the application's version information, typically found in the UI footer, package.json file, or by querying the application's API endpoint for version detailsAffected if The installed version is exactly 1.2.7
-
Verify project import feature accessibilityCheck if the project import functionality is enabled and accessible in the application. This may be visible in the UI as an import option or accessible via API endpoints such as /api/projects/import or similar import-related routesAffected if The project import feature is enabled and accessible to users
-
Inspect project file handling configurationReview FUXA configuration files (such as settings.json or similar config files in the application directory) for any settings related to project import, script execution, or sandbox configurationAffected if No script sandboxing or validation settings are found or configured for imported projects
-
Check for existing imported project filesExamine the application's data or projects directory for any recently imported project files that may contain embedded scripts or commandsAffected if Imported project files exist in the system and can contain unsandboxed scripts
You are affected if running FUXA version 1.2.7 AND the project import feature is accessible, as the vulnerability allows arbitrary code execution through malicious imported project files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable or restrict the project import functionality until a security patch is available. Implement strict input validation, sanitization, and sandboxing for all scripts and commands within imported project files.
Latest stable release newer than v1.2.7 (check GitHub releases for specific version)
- 1. Identify the current FUXA installation version by checking the application interface or package configuration
- 2. Navigate to the official FUXA GitHub repository releases page at github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases
- 3. Identify the latest stable release version that is newer than v1.2.7
- 4. Review the release notes for the fixed version to confirm the RCE vulnerability (CVE-2025-69983) is addressed
- 5. Backup the current FUXA application data, configuration, and any existing projects
- 6. Stop the FUXA service or application
- 7. Upgrade FUXA to the fixed version following the official upgrade documentation
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-69983 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-69983 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data