CVE-2025-7410
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in code-projects LifeStyle Store 1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /cart_remove.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the cart_remove.php file of the LifeStyle Store 1.0 application. The ID parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in database queries, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands. This could allow unauthorized database access, data theft, or potentially remote code execution depending on database configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm LifeStyle Store 1.0 installationLocate the application files on the server. Check for the presence of cart_remove.php and other LifeStyle Store application files. Identify the web root directory where the store is deployed.Affected if The LifeStyle Store version 1.0 is installed and accessible via web server.
-
Locate vulnerable cart_remove.php fileSearch for the file cart_remove.php in the application directory structure. This file typically resides in the shopping cart or checkout-related path.Affected if The file cart_remove.php exists in the application deployment.
-
Verify cart functionality is enabledTest accessing the cart_remove.php endpoint via HTTP request (e.g., GET or POST to the file with an ID parameter). Check if the shopping cart feature is active in the application.Affected if The cart_remove.php script is accessible and processes requests.
-
Check application uses database for cart operationsExamine the cart_remove.php source code to confirm it performs database queries. Look for SQL query execution that incorporates the ID parameter without prepared statements.Affected if The cart_remove.php file executes SQL queries using the ID parameter from user input.
The environment is affected if LifeStyle Store 1.0 is installed, cart_remove.php exists, and the ID parameter is processed in SQL queries without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries/prepared statements for all database operations, particularly the ID parameter in cart_remove.php. Additionally, apply input validation, least-privilege database accounts, and monitor for anomalous query patterns. If a vendor patch becomes available, apply it promptly.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7410 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7410 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data