CVE-2025-7411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in code-projects LifeStyle Store 1.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /success.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the ID parameter of /success.php in LifeStyle Store 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands by manipulating the ID argument.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the LifeStyle Store installationSearch the web server document root for the /success.php file. Common paths include /var/www/html/, /www/, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\. Run: find /var/www -name 'success.php' 2>/dev/nullAffected if The file success.php exists in the web directory and belongs to LifeStyle Store 1.0
-
Verify the product versionCheck for a version file or header in the application. Look for version.php, README, or meta tags in index.php. Compare the found version to 1.0Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 (Anisha Lifestyle Store)
-
Inspect the ID parameter handling in success.phpOpen success.php and locate the code that handles the ID parameter from GET/POST requests. Search for $_GET['ID'] or $_POST['ID'] usageAffected if The ID parameter is directly used in SQL queries without parameterization
-
Check if database queries use prepared statementsReview success.php for the presence of prepared statements (prepare(), bind_param(), execute()) versus direct query concatenation using the ID variableAffected if SQL queries concatenate the ID parameter directly into the query string (e.g., "SELECT * FROM table WHERE ID=" . $_GET['ID'])
-
Confirm the database user privilegesIf accessible, check the database user configured in the application's config file (often config.php or db.php) to see if it has write privileges beyond what the application requiresAffected if The database user has privileges that could allow attacker-modified queries to modify or exfiltrate data
A user is affected if they have Anisha Lifestyle Store version 1.0 installed and the success.php file contains direct SQL query construction using the ID parameter without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements in /success.php, perform input validation on the ID parameter, and audit other files for similar SQL injection vulnerabilities.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data