CVE-2025-7467
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in code-projects Modern Bag 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /product-detail.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Modern Bag 1.0's /product-detail.php script through the unprotected ID parameter. Attackers can inject malicious SQL queries to exfiltrate, modify, or delete database contents. The 9.8 CVSS score reflects the trivial exploitability and complete confidentiality/integrity impact achievable remotely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Modern Bag applicationSearch the web server filesystem for directories or files containing 'modern-bag', 'modern bag', or the application codebase. Check common web root locations like /var/www/html, /htdocs, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot.Affected if The application is present on the server
-
Verify the application versionInspect version files (version.txt, README, composer.json, or similar) in the application root directory to confirm the installed version is 1.0.Affected if The installed version is Code Projects Modern Bag 1.0
-
Check for vulnerable scriptLocate the product-detail.php file within the application directory structure. This is typically found in the main web-accessible directory or a /php/ subfolder.Affected if The product-detail.php file exists in the application
-
Confirm ID parameter handlingExamine the product-detail.php source code to determine whether the ID parameter is used in dynamic SQL queries without prepared statements or input validation.Affected if The ID parameter is processed via unsanitized dynamic SQL queries in the code
-
Assess network accessibilityVerify that the product-detail.php script is accessible over the network via HTTP/HTTPS to an external or untrusted user.Affected if The script is reachable from the network without authentication
A user is affected if they have Code Projects Modern Bag version 1.0 installed with the product-detail.php script accessible and the ID parameter handled through unprotected dynamic SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with prepared statements/parameterized queries, implement strict input validation on the ID parameter, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts. Consider deploying a WAF as an interim control.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7467 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data