CVE-2025-7533
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in code-projects Job Diary 1.0 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /view-details.php. The manipulation of the argument job_id leads to sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in code-projects Job Diary 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the job_id parameter in /view-details.php. The application fails to properly sanitize user input before using it in database queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Anisha Job Diary is installedSearch the web server document root for files named 'view-details.php' or look for directories containing 'job-diary' or 'anisha' in the path. Check for files like 'index.php', 'login.php', or other application entry points that indicate this specific application.Affected if The application files exist on the server in a web-accessible directory.
-
Identify the installed versionCheck for a version file, readme.txt, or the footer of any application page for the version number. Examine the source code of index.php or similar entry files for version strings like 'v1.0' or 'version 1.0'.Affected if The application version is exactly 1.0.
-
Locate the vulnerable fileVerify that /view-details.php exists in the web root. Attempt to access the file directly via HTTP request, for example: GET /view-details.phpAffected if The file view-details.php is present and accessible via the web server.
-
Check if job_id parameter is acceptedSend a request to view-details.php with a test value for job_id, for example: GET /view-details.php?job_id=1. Observe whether the application accepts and processes this parameter without proper authentication or validation.Affected if The job_id parameter is processed by view-details.php and reaches a database query without sanitization.
All four conditions must be true: Anisha Job Diary is installed, version is exactly 1.0, view-details.php is accessible, and the job_id parameter is accepted and used in dynamic SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements in view-details.php. Apply input validation and use least-privilege database accounts. Consider deploying a WAF as an additional layer of defense.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7533 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7533 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data