CVE-2025-7593
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in code-projects Job Diary 1.0 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /view-all.php. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in /view-all.php of code-projects Job Diary 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate the ID parameter and inject arbitrary SQL queries. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 indicates potential for complete database compromise, including unauthorized data access, modification, or potential remote code execution through database features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Job Diary installationLocate the web application files and identify if the 'code-projects Job Diary' application version 1.0 is installed on the server. Check for directories containing 'job-diary', 'jobdiary', or similar naming patterns.Affected if The application directory contains Job Diary 1.0 files from code-projects
-
Verify vulnerable file existsCheck for the presence of /view-all.php in the application web root directory.Affected if The file view-all.php exists in the Job Diary installation
-
Identify SQL query handling in view-all.phpOpen view-all.php and examine how the ID parameter is processed in SQL queries. Look for dynamic query construction where the ID parameter is concatenated directly into the SQL statement without using prepared statements or parameter binding.Affected if The ID parameter is used in a SQL query without parameterized queries or input sanitization
-
Test ID parameter for SQL injectionIf the application is accessible, send a crafted request to view-all.php with the ID parameter (e.g., ID=1' OR '1'='1) and observe the application response for SQL syntax errors or unexpected data leakage.Affected if The application returns SQL error messages or responds differently to malformed SQL input in the ID parameter
If Job Diary 1.0 is installed and view-all.php processes the ID parameter with direct string concatenation in SQL queries, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements in /view-all.php for the ID parameter. Input validation and escaping should also be implemented as defense-in-depth.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-7593 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-7593 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data