CVE-2025-9770
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in Campcodes Hospital Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /admin/ of the component Admin Dashboard Login. This manipulation of the argument Password causes sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Campcodes Hospital Management System 1.0 admin login at /admin/ allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through the Password parameter. The lack of parameterized queries or input sanitization enables unauthenticated attackers to potentially access or manipulate the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed application and versionExamine the application footer, about page, or source files for the version string '1.0'. Check if the application name includes 'Campcodes Hospital Management System'.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0 and the application is Campcodes Hospital Management System
-
Verify the /admin/ login endpoint is accessibleConfirm the application exposes a login page at the /admin/ path by attempting to access it via browser or curl command.Affected if The /admin/ login page is accessible and responds with a login form
-
Confirm the login form includes a Password parameterInspect the HTML source of the login page at /admin/ and verify there is an input field named 'password' or similar.Affected if A Password input field is present in the login form at /admin/
-
Check for SQL injection vulnerability in the Password fieldSubmit a SQL injection test payload (such as a single quote ') in the Password field and observe if the application returns a database error or behaves unexpectedly.Affected if Submitting special SQL characters in the Password field triggers unusual database errors or unexpected behavior
If you have Campcodes Hospital Management System version 1.0 running with an accessible /admin/ login page containing a Password parameter that does not properly sanitize input, your environment is affected by CVE-2025-9770.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries in the login handler with parameterized queries/prepared statements, implement proper input validation on the Password field, and apply any vendor security patches if available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-9770 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-9770 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data