Operation And Maintenance Security Management SystemApplication · Sangfor

CVE-2026-1413

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.0.12 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability was found in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System up to 3.0.12. This affects the function portValidate of the file /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument port results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A command injection vulnerability exists in Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System (up to v3.0.12) within the HTTP POST Request Handler. The portValidate function in /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate fails to properly sanitize the port argument, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands by manipulating the POST request.

MitigationImmediately restrict network exposure of the affected system, implement WAF rules to block malicious port parameter values, and apply vendor patch if available. Consider disabling the vulnerable endpoint or upgrading to a patched version.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Operation And Maintenance Security Management SystemApplication
Affected:<= 3.0.12

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Sangfor product and version
    Access the system's admin interface or check system files for the Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System version. This is typically found in the about page, system info, or configuration files within the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.0.12 or lower.
  2. Locate the vulnerable port_validate endpoint
    Check if the endpoint /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate exists on the web server. This can be done by attempting to access it via HTTP/HTTPS or reviewing the web application's file structure.
    Affected if The endpoint /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate is present and accessible on the system.
  3. Verify HTTP POST requests are accepted on the vulnerable endpoint
    Send a test HTTP POST request to /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate with a crafted port parameter. Observe if the application processes the parameter without sanitization.
    Affected if The endpoint accepts POST requests and processes the port parameter without proper input validation.
  4. Check network accessibility of the vulnerable service
    Determine if the web interface is exposed to untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, network configurations, or by performing a port scan to identify exposed HTTP/HTTPS ports.
    Affected if The Sangfor management interface is accessible from untrusted networks without proper access controls.

The system is affected if it runs Sangfor Operation and Maintenance Security Management System version 3.0.12 or lower AND the /fort/ip_and_port/port_validate endpoint is accessible, allowing unauthenticated command injection via the port parameter in POST requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.0.12
Interim mitigation

Immediately restrict network exposure of the affected system, implement WAF rules to block malicious port parameter values, and apply vendor patch if available. Consider disabling the vulnerable endpoint or upgrading to a patched version.

Fix this in Operation And Maintenance Security Management System Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-1413 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-1413 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data