CVE-2026-2004
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing validation of type of input in PostgreSQL intarray extension selectivity estimator function allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, and 14.21 are affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing type validation vulnerability exists in the PostgreSQL intarray extension's selectivity estimator function. An attacker who can create database objects can craft malicious input that bypasses type checking, allowing arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the operating system user running the PostgreSQL server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 14.0, < 14.21>= 15.0, < 15.16>= 16.0, < 16.12>= 17.0, < 17.8>= 18.0, < 18.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PostgreSQL server versionRun `SELECT version();` from psql or use `psql --version` from command lineAffected if Version is 14.0 through 14.20, 15.0 through 15.15, 16.0 through 16.11, 17.0 through 17.7, or 18.0 through 18.1 (i.e., any version in the ranges >= 14.0 < 14.21, >= 15.0 < 15.16, >= 16.0 < 16.12, >= 17.0 < 17.8, >= 18.0 < 18.2)
-
Confirm intarray extension is installedRun `SELECT * FROM pg_extension WHERE extname = 'intarray';` in the target databaseAffected if The intarray extension is present in the database (vulnerable code path requires the extension to be loaded)
-
Check for users with object creation privilegesRun `SELECT rolname FROM pg_roles WHERE rolcreatedb = true OR rolcanlogin = true;` and review database usersAffected if Any database user has permission to create objects (the attack requires the attacker to be able to create database objects)
You are affected if your PostgreSQL version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the intarray extension is installed in your database AND an untrusted user has permission to create database objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.2115.1616.12
Upgrade PostgreSQL to version 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, or 14.21 or later. If the intarray extension is not required, disable or drop it to reduce attack surface.
PostgreSQL 14.21, 15.16, 16.12, or 17.8 (upgrade within your current major version branch)
- Schedule a planned maintenance window for the database upgrade
- Create a full backup of all PostgreSQL databases before proceeding
- Identify your current PostgreSQL major version (14, 15, 16, or 17)
- Upgrade PostgreSQL to the corresponding fixed version: 14.21 for 14.x, 15.16 for 15.x, 16.12 for 16.x, or 17.8 for 17.x
- For package-based installations (Yum/DNF/Apt), run: sudo yum/dnf/apt update postgresqlXX where XX is your major version, or download and install from the official PostgreSQL repository
- For source installations, compile and install from PostgreSQL source version 14.21, 15.16, 16.12, or 17.8 as appropriate
- After upgrade, start/restart the PostgreSQL service
- Verify the intarray extension is functional and the server is accepting connections
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2004 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.postgresql.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2004 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data