CVE-2026-20070
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the VPN web services component of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a browser that is accessing an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input in HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to follow a link to a malicious website that is designed to submit malicious input to the affected application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary HTML or script code in the browser in the context of the VPN web server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the VPN web services component of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA and FTD appliances. The vulnerability stems from improper validation of user-supplied input in HTTP requests, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to inject malicious scripts via crafted URLs. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary HTML or script execution in the context of a user's browser when accessing the VPN web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.12.1= 9.12.1.2= 9.12.1.3= 9.12.2= 9.12.2.1= 9.12.2.4= 9.12.2.5= 9.12.2.9= 9.12.3= 9.12.3.2= 9.12.3.7= 9.12.3.9= 6.4.0= 6.4.0.1= 6.4.0.2= 6.4.0.3= 6.4.0.4= 6.4.0.5= 6.4.0.6= 6.4.0.7= 6.4.0.8= 6.4.0.9= 6.4.0.10= 6.4.0.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco appliance typeDetermine if the device is running Cisco ASA (Adaptive Security Appliance) or FTD (Firepower Threat Defense) using the CLI command 'show version' or via the management interface.Affected if The device is either an ASA or FTD appliance.
-
Check the installed ASA versionRun 'show version' on the ASA CLI and note the software version number. Compare against the affected list: 9.12.1, 9.12.1.2, 9.12.1.3, 9.12.2, 9.12.2.1, 9.12.2.4, 9.12.2.5, 9.12.2.9, 9.12.3, 9.12.3.2, 9.12.3.7, 9.12.3.9.Affected if The ASA software version matches exactly one of these versions.
-
Check the installed FTD versionRun 'show version' on the FTD device and note the software version number. Compare against the affected list: 6.4.0 through 6.4.0.11 (inclusive).Affected if The FTD software version is 6.4.0.x where x is 0 through 11.
-
Verify VPN web services are enabledCheck if the ASA/FTD VPN web management interface (WebVPN or SSL VPN) is enabled via 'show run webvpn' or through the ASDM/FDM management interface under VPN configuration.Affected if WebVPN or SSL VPN web services are currently enabled on the appliance.
-
Confirm VPN web interface accessibilityDetermine if the VPN web management port (typically 443) is reachable from untrusted networks by reviewing access lists, interface security levels, or performing a network scan from an external location.Affected if The VPN web interface is exposed to networks outside the trusted internal network.
A user is affected if they are running ASA version 9.12.x or FTD version 6.4.0.x with the VPN web services interface enabled and accessible, even from a single affected version match.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco security patch for CVE-2026-20070 when released. In the interim, restrict access to the VPN web management interface to trusted networks only and educate users about avoiding untrusted links.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20070 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20070 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data