CVE-2026-20102
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the SAML 2.0 single sign-on (SSO) feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against the SAML feature and access sensitive, browser-based information. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of multiple HTTP parameters. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to access a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to conduct a reflected XSS attack through an affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the SAML 2.0 single sign-on feature of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA and FTD software due to insufficient input validation of HTTP parameters. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by tricking a user into clicking a malicious link, allowing execution of arbitrary JavaScript in the user's browser to steal sensitive browser-based information such as session cookies or tokens.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.16.1, < 9.16.4.89>= 9.17.1, < 9.18.4.71>= 9.20.1, < 9.20.4.19>= 9.22.1.1, < 9.22.2.32>= 9.23.1, < 9.23.1.26>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.9>= 7.1.0, < 7.2.11>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3>= 7.6.0, < 10.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco device typeRun 'show version' on the device CLI. Look for 'Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance' or 'Cisco Firepower Threat Defense' in the output to determine if the device is ASA or FTD.Affected if Device is either ASA or FTD model
-
Check the installed software versionRun 'show version' and locate the software version number (e.g., 9.17.1, 7.2.10). Compare this version against the affected ranges: ASA: >= 9.16.1 < 9.16.4.89, >= 9.17.1 < 9.18.4.71, >= 9.20.1 < 9.20.4.19, >= 9.22.1.1 < 9.22.2.32, >= 9.23.1 < 9.23.1.26. FTD: >= 7.0.0 < 7.0.9, >= 7.1.0 < 7.2.11, >= 7.4.0 < 7.4.3, >= 7.6.0 < 10.0.0.Affected if Version falls within any of the listed affected ranges for your device type
-
Verify SAML 2.0 SSO is configuredOn ASA, run 'show run webvpn' or 'show running-config webvpn' and look for 'saml idp' configuration. On FTD, run 'show running-config saml' or check via FMC under Device > VPN > SAML SSO.Affected if SAML SSO is enabled and configured on the device
Device is affected if it runs ASA or FTD software with a version in the affected ranges AND has SAML 2.0 SSO feature enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.97.2.117.4.3
Apply the vendor-provided Cisco software patches when available. Until then, consider disabling SAML SSO if not essential, implement WAF rules to filter malicious URL parameters, and educate users about avoiding suspicious links.
ASA: 9.16.4.89+, 9.18.4.71+, 9.20.4.19+, or 9.22.2.32+ | FTD: 7.0.9+, 7.2.11+, 7.4.3+, or 10.0.0+
- 1. Identify the current version of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software or Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software running on the device using 'show version' command
- 2. Determine which version branch the current installation falls into based on the affected version ranges provided
- 3. For ASA Software: If running 9.16.x, upgrade to 9.16.4.89 or later; if running 9.17.x or 9.18.x, upgrade to 9.18.4.71 or later; if running 9.20.x, upgrade to 9.20.4.19 or later; if running 9.22.x, upgrade to 9.22.2.32 or later
- 4. For FTD Software: If running 7.0.x, upgrade to 7.0.9 or later; if running 7.1.x or 7.2.x, upgrade to 7.2.11 or later; if running 7.4.x, upgrade to 7.4.3 or later; if running 7.6.x or later, upgrade to 10.0.0 or later
- 5. Download the appropriate Cisco software update from the Cisco Software Download center (software.cisco.com) or via your Cisco Smart Account
- 6. Follow standard Cisco ASA/FTD upgrade procedures: backup configuration, upload new image, perform upgrade via 'upgrade' command or ASDM/FDM
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed and test SAML SSO functionality to confirm the fix is working
- 8. Review Cisco release notes for the target version to ensure compatibility with your deployment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20102 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20102 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data