CVE-2026-20164
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.2.0, 10.0.3, 9.4.9, and 9.3.10, and Splunk Cloud Platform versions below 10.2.2510.5, 10.1.2507.16, 10.0.2503.11, and 9.3.2411.123, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could access the `/splunkd/__raw/servicesNS/-/-/configs/conf-passwords` REST API endpoint, which exposes the hashed or plaintext password values that are stored in the passwords.conf configuration file due to improper access control. This vulnerability could allow for the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an improper access control vulnerability in Splunk Enterprise and Cloud Platform where low-privileged users (non-admin, non-power roles) can access the /splunkd/__raw/servicesNS/-/-/configs/conf-passwords REST API endpoint. This endpoint exposes hashed or plaintext password values stored in passwords.conf, allowing unauthorized disclosure of sensitive credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 9.3.0, < 9.3.10>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.9>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.3>= 9.3.2411, < 9.3.2411.123>= 10.0.2503, < 10.0.2503.11>= 10.1.2507, < 10.1.2507.16>= 10.2.2510, < 10.2.2510.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Splunk Enterprise versionRun `splunk --version` from the Splunk bin directory or access the About page in the Splunk Web UI to identify the exact version numberAffected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 9.3.0 to 9.3.9, 9.4.0 to 9.4.8, or 10.0.0 to 10.0.2
-
Verify low-privileged user accounts existUse Splunk management CLI: `splunk list user` or access Settings > Users and Roles in Splunk Web UI to identify users with roles other than admin or powerAffected if Any user account exists with a role that is not admin or power (such as user, analyst, or custom low-privilege roles)
-
Test vulnerable endpoint access with low-privilege accountAuthenticate with a non-admin/non-power user account and send a GET request to `https://<splunkhost>/splunkd/__raw/servicesNS/-/-/configs/conf-passwords`Affected if The request returns HTTP 200 with password configuration data (either hashed or plaintext values in the response body)
-
Inspect passwords.conf for credential exposureLocate passwords.conf file in $SPLUNK_HOME/etc/system/local/ or within an app's local directory and examine whether passwords are stored in plaintext or readable hash formatAffected if The file contains any password entries that low-privileged users could retrieve through the REST API
You are affected if your Splunk version is below the fixed releases AND you have low-privileged users who can successfully query the /splunkd/__raw/servicesNS/-/-/configs/conf-passwords endpoint and obtain password data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.3.109.3.2411.1239.4.9
Upgrade to the fixed Splunk versions (Enterprise: 10.2.0, 10.0.3, 9.4.9, 9.3.10+; Cloud Platform: 10.2.2510.5, 10.1.2507.16, 10.0.2503.11, 9.3.2411.123+). As a compensating control, review user role assignments and restrict access to the passwords.conf endpoint until patching is complete.
Splunk Enterprise: 9.3.10+, 9.4.9+, 10.0.3+ | Splunk Cloud Platform: 9.3.2411.123+, 10.0.2503.11+, 10.1.2507.16+, 10.2.2510.5+
- Identify the currently installed Splunk Enterprise or Splunk Cloud Platform version using the Splunk web interface (Settings > About) or by running: splunk version
- For Splunk Enterprise: If running 9.3.x, upgrade to 9.3.10 or later; if running 9.4.x, upgrade to 9.4.9 or later; if running 10.0.x, upgrade to 10.0.3 or later; if running 10.1.x or 10.2.x, upgrade to the latest available version
- For Splunk Cloud Platform: Contact Splunk Support to request upgrade to the appropriate fixed version based on current deployment (9.3.2411.123, 10.0.2503.11, 10.1.2507.16, or 10.2.2510.5)
- After upgrade, verify the fix by confirming that low-privileged users (non-admin, non-power roles) can no longer access the /splunkd/__raw/servicesNS/-/-/configs/conf-passwords endpoint
- Review user role assignments to ensure only authorized administrative users have access to credential configurations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20164 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20164 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data