CVE-2026-20815
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Capability Access Management Service (camsvc) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
- Microsoft January 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes 3 zero-days, 114 flaws
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition exists in the Capability Access Management Service (camsvc) where concurrent access to shared resources lacks proper synchronization. An authorized local attacker can exploit this timing vulnerability to manipulate the service's behavior and elevate their privileges to a higher permission level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.26100.7623< 10.0.26200.7623< 10.0.26100.32230CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt, or use 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsProductName,OsVersion,OsBuildNumber' in PowerShellAffected if The system is Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2, or Windows Server 2025 with a build number below the fixed versions (26100.7623 for 24h2, 26200.7623 for 25h2, 26100.32230 for Server 2025)
-
Verify the Capability Access Management Service (camsvc) is presentRun 'Get-Service camsvc' in PowerShell or check Services list for 'Capability Access Management Service'Affected if The camsvc service exists on the system, indicating it is a vulnerable Windows version where this service is included
-
Confirm camsvc is runningRun 'Get-Service camsvc | Select-Object Status' in PowerShell or check the service status in Services.mscAffected if The camsvc service status is 'Running', meaning the exploitable code path is active
-
Check OS build against vulnerable version thresholdsCompare the OS build number from step 1 against: Windows 11 24h2 < 10.0.26100.7623, Windows 11 25h2 < 10.0.26200.7623, Windows Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.32230Affected if The installed build number falls below the corresponding fixed build for the detected Windows edition
The system is affected if it runs Windows 11 24h2, 25h2, or Windows Server 2025 with a build number lower than the fixed thresholds and the camsvc service is present and running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.26100.762310.0.26100.3223010.0.26200.7623
Apply vendor-supplied patches for camsvc when available; until then, limit local access to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious process activity targeting the capability access management service.
Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.7623 or later | Windows 11 25h2: build 10.0.26200.7623 or later | Windows Server 2025: build 10.0.26100.32230 or later
- Check current Windows version by running `winver` or `systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"`
- Open Settings > Windows Update > Check for updates
- Install all available security updates, specifically looking for the KB patch addressing CVE-2026-20815
- Alternatively, manually download the update from the Microsoft Update Catalog website for your specific Windows version
- Restart the system after installing the update
- Verify the update was applied by checking the installed KB articles or re-running `winver` to confirm the build number meets or exceeds: 10.0.26100.7623 (Windows 11 24h2), 10.0.26200.7623 (Windows 11 25h2), or 10.0.26100.32230 (Windows Server 2025)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20815 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20815 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data