Mobiliti E Mobi.huApplication · Mvm

CVE-2026-20882

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The WebSocket API lacks rate limiting on authentication requests, allowing unlimited authentication attempts from a single client. This vulnerability enables both brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access and denial-of-service attacks by overwhelming the system, potentially suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry.

MitigationImplement rate limiting on WebSocket authentication endpoints to restrict the number of authentication attempts per client within a defined time window, combined with account lockout policies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mobiliti E Mobi.huApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed product
    Confirm the system is running Mvm Mobiliti E Mobi.hu by checking application metadata, service name, or startup configuration files that identify the product
    Affected if The system is confirmed to be Mvm Mobiliti E Mobi.hu and is using WebSocket-based authentication
  2. Locate WebSocket endpoints
    Review API documentation or network traffic to identify WebSocket endpoints, particularly those handling authentication or login requests (often found at paths like /ws/auth, /websocket/login, or similar)
    Affected if WebSocket endpoints exist that handle authentication without visible rate limiting controls
  3. Check rate limiting configuration
    Examine the server or API gateway configuration files (such as nginx.conf, Apache config, or application-level rate limit settings) for rules that limit authentication attempts on WebSocket upgrade requests
    Affected if No rate limiting rules are defined for WebSocket authentication endpoints, or the configuration allows unlimited authentication attempts from a single client IP
  4. Test authentication attempt limits
    Send multiple sequential WebSocket connection requests with authentication credentials from a single client source and observe if requests are rejected or throttled after a certain number of attempts
    Affected if The system accepts unlimited authentication attempts without imposing any throttling, lockout, or request frequency limits
  5. Verify account lockout policies
    Check if account lockout policies are configured for failed authentication attempts on the WebSocket authentication endpoint
    Affected if No account lockout or temporary suspension policy exists for repeated failed authentication attempts

The environment is affected if it runs Mvm Mobiliti E Mobi.hu with exposed WebSocket authentication endpoints that do not enforce rate limiting or account lockout controls on authentication requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement rate limiting on WebSocket authentication endpoints to restrict the number of authentication attempts per client within a defined time window, combined with account lockout policies.

Fix this in Mobiliti E Mobi.hu Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-20882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-20882 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data