CVE-2026-26051
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWebSocket endpoints lack proper authentication mechanisms, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized station impersonation and manipulate data sent to the backend. An unauthenticated attacker can connect to the OCPP WebSocket endpoint using a known or discovered charging station identifier, then issue or receive OCPP commands as a legitimate charger. Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to privilege escalation, unauthorized control of charging infrastructure, and corruption of charging network data reported to the backend.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceWebSocket endpoints for OCPP (Open Charge Point Protocol) lack authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to connect using known or discovered charging station identifiers and impersonate legitimate chargers. This enables unauthorized command execution and data manipulation in the charging infrastructure backend.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Mvm Mobiliti E Mobi.hu is deployedReview your infrastructure inventory, deployed software list, or vendor documentation to confirm presence of Mvm Mobiliti E Mobi.hu charging station management systemAffected if Mvm Mobiliti E Mobi.hu is present in the environment
-
Locate OCPP WebSocket endpointsSearch configuration files, network scans, or API documentation for WebSocket endpoints typically exposed on ports 8080, 8443, or 9000-10000 with paths containing '/ocpp/', '/ws/', or similar OCPP-related patternsAffected if OCPP WebSocket endpoints are found and accessible
-
Verify authentication configuration on OCPP endpointsExamine the OCPP server configuration files, authentication settings, or TLS/certificate configuration to determine if client authentication (certificate validation, OAuth, API keys) is enforcedAffected if No authentication mechanism is configured or required for WebSocket connections
-
Check station identifier validationInspect the backend code or configuration that processes incoming station identifiers (ChargePointId) to verify if validation occurs before accepting commandsAffected if Station identifiers are accepted without validation or verification against a trusted whitelist
-
Test for unauthenticated WebSocket accessUse a WebSocket client tool to attempt a connection to the OCPP endpoint using a fabricated or discovered station identifier without providing credentialsAffected if Connection is accepted and commands can be sent without authentication
Environment is affected if Mvm Mobiliti E Mobi.hu is deployed and OCPP WebSocket endpoints accept connections without requiring authentication or validating station identifiers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust authentication (e.g., TLS certificate validation, OAuth tokens, or API keys) for all WebSocket connections and validate station identifiers before accepting any OCPP commands.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26051 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26051 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data