Node.jsApplication

CVE-2026-21711

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2026-03-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 20.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
55/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw in Node.js Permission Model network enforcement leaves Unix Domain Socket (UDS) server operations without the required permission checks, while all comparable network paths correctly enforce them. As a result, code running under `--permission` without `--allow-net` can create and expose local IPC endpoints, allowing communication with other processes on the same host outside of the intended network restriction boundary. This vulnerability affects Node.js **25.x** processes using the Permission Model where `--allow-net` is intentionally omitted to restrict network access. Note that `--allow-net` is currently an experimental feature.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Node.js 25.x Permission Model incorrectly omits permission checks for Unix Domain Socket (UDS) server creation, allowing code running with --permission but without --allow-net to still create local IPC endpoints and communicate with other processes on the same host, bypassing the intended network restriction boundary.

MitigationAvoid using the experimental Node.js Permission Model for security-critical deployments until the vulnerability is patched; alternatively, monitor for Node.js security releases addressing this UDS permission bypass.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Node.jsApplication
Affected:< 20.0.0>= 25.0.0, <= 25.8.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Node.js version
    Run `node --version` to determine the installed Node.js version
    Affected if Version is 25.x (any subversion)
  2. Check if Permission Model is enabled
    Review application startup scripts, process arguments, or environment for the `--permission` flag being passed to the Node.js process
    Affected if The `--permission` flag is present in the Node.js execution command
  3. Verify network permission configuration
    Review the permission flags passed to Node.js. Look specifically for whether `--allow-net` is absent or explicitly set to restrict network access
    Affected if `--permission` is used but `--allow-net` is NOT granted (the intended restriction that can be bypassed)
  4. Inspect for Unix Domain Socket usage
    Search application code for `net.createServer()` or `server.listen()` calls that use a file path string as the address (e.g., `server.listen('/tmp/socket.sock')`), or for `path` module usage creating socket files
    Affected if The application creates Unix Domain Socket servers while using restricted permissions without explicit UDS allowance

You are affected if running Node.js 25.x with the experimental Permission Model enabled (`--permission`) and network access is restricted (no `--allow-net`), while the application creates or could create Unix Domain Socket endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 20.0.0 or later
Fixed in 20.0.0
Interim mitigation

Avoid using the experimental Node.js Permission Model for security-critical deployments until the vulnerability is patched; alternatively, monitor for Node.js security releases addressing this UDS permission bypass.

Fix this in Node.js Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
4.0 hours of engineering $750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-21711 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-21711 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data