Ecase AuditApplication · Opexustech

CVE-2026-22232

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.14.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OPEXUS eCASE Audit allows an authenticated attacker to save JavaScript in the "A or SIC Number" field within the Project Setup functionality. The JavaScript is executed whenever another user views the project. Fixed in OPEXUS eCASE Audit 11.14.2.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OPEXUS eCASE Audit contains a stored XSS vulnerability in the Project Setup functionality. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into the 'A or SIC Number' field, which executes in the browsers of other users when they view the affected project.

MitigationUpgrade to OPEXUS eCASE Audit version 11.14.2.0 or later, which includes proper input sanitization for the affected field.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ecase AuditApplication
Affected:>= 11.4.0, < 11.14.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed eCASE Audit version
    Access the application admin panel or system information page, typically found under Help > About or System Administration > Version Info. Compare the displayed version number against the affected range of >= 11.4.0 and < 11.14.2.0.
    Affected if Version is 11.4.0 through 11.14.1.x (any build below 11.14.2.0)
  2. Verify Project Setup module is accessible
    Log in as a standard user or admin and navigate to the Project Setup or Projects section. Confirm the 'A or SIC Number' field is present and editable in the project creation or editing interface.
    Affected if The Project Setup functionality with the 'A or SIC Number' field is available and enabled in the application
  3. Inspect application logs for XSS patterns in SIC field
    Search application logs (typically in /logs or via the admin logging console) for entries containing script tags, javascript:, or HTML event handlers (onclick, onerror, etc.) within what appears to be SIC number or project setup data.
    Affected if Log entries contain malicious script payloads or encoded XSS patterns in project/SIC-related fields
  4. Review database for stored XSS payloads
    Query the project or case database tables (commonly named Projects, Cases, or similar) for the 'A or SIC Number' field. Look for non-numeric characters, HTML tags, or JavaScript code stored in this field.
    Affected if The database contains HTML tags, script elements, or JavaScript code in the SIC Number field

Your environment is affected if eCASE Audit version is between 11.4.0 and 11.14.1.x AND the Project Setup module with the 'A or SIC Number' field is in use.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.14.2.0 or later
Fixed in 11.14.2.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to OPEXUS eCASE Audit version 11.14.2.0 or later, which includes proper input sanitization for the affected field.

Recommended fix High confidence

11.14.2.0

  1. Backup the current OPEXUS eCASE Audit installation and database
  2. Download OPEXUS eCASE Audit version 11.14.2.0 from the official vendor source
  3. Apply the upgrade following OPEXUS vendor documentation for version 11.14.2.0
  4. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging in and checking the version
  5. Confirm the "A or SIC Number" field in Project Setup no longer executes stored JavaScript

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ecase Audit Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22232 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22232 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data