Ecase AuditApplication · Opexustech

CVE-2026-22233

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.14.2.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OPEXUS eCASE Audit allows an authenticated attacker to save JavaScript as a comment in the "Estimated Staff Hours" field. The JavaScript is executed whenever another user visits the Project Cost tab. Fixed in OPEXUS eCASE Audit 11.14.2.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in OPEXUS eCASE Audit. An authenticated attacker can inject malicious JavaScript into the 'Estimated Staff Hours' field, which persists and executes whenever other users navigate to the Project Cost tab, allowing session hijacking or credential theft.

MitigationUpgrade OPEXUS eCASE Audit to version 11.14.2.0 or later to apply the vendor patch that addresses this stored XSS vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ecase AuditApplication
Affected:>= 11.4.0, < 11.14.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm OPEXUS eCASE Audit installation
    Identify where eCASE Audit is deployed in your environment and verify the application is accessible
    Affected if OPEXUS eCASE Audit is not installed, then not affected
  2. Determine installed eCASE Audit version
    Locate the version information for your eCASE Audit installation, typically accessible via the application admin panel, about page, or installation documentation
    Affected if The installed version is 11.4.0 or higher but lower than 11.14.2.0
  3. Verify application authentication is enabled
    Confirm that user authentication is required to access eCASE Audit functionality
    Affected if The application allows unauthenticated access to all features, then the specific authenticated attack vector may not apply
  4. Check for presence of Project Cost module
    Determine if the Project Cost tab feature is enabled and accessible within your eCASE Audit deployment
    Affected if The Project Cost module with Estimated Staff Hours field exists and is accessible to authenticated users

Your environment is affected if OPEXUS eCASE Audit version is 11.4.0 or higher but lower than 11.14.2.0 and the Project Cost module with Estimated Staff Hours field is accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.14.2.0 or later
Fixed in 11.14.2.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade OPEXUS eCASE Audit to version 11.14.2.0 or later to apply the vendor patch that addresses this stored XSS vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

OPEXUS eCASE Audit version 11.14.2.0

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of OPEXUS eCASE Audit by accessing the admin console or checking system documentation
  2. 2. Confirm the current version is within the affected range: >= 11.4.0 and < 11.14.2.0
  3. 3. Review OPEXUS upgrade documentation for version 11.14.2.0 at docs.opexustech.com
  4. 4. Create a full backup of the current eCASE Audit database and configuration files
  5. 5. Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment first
  6. 6. Schedule a maintenance window for the production upgrade
  7. 7. Run the vendor upgrade procedure to update eCASE Audit to version 11.14.2.0
  8. 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
Caveat Standard minor version upgrade precautions apply; review release notes for any configuration or workflow changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ecase Audit Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22233 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22233 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data