CVE-2026-22548
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests along with conditions beyond the attacker's control can cause the bd process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF and ASM allows undisclosed requests (when a security policy is configured on a virtual server) to cause the bd (background daemon) process to terminate. Successful exploitation requires specific conditions beyond the attacker's full control, making reliable exploitation difficult.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.3>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun `tmsh show /sys version` or `tmsh show /sys software` to obtain the installed versionAffected if Version is >= 17.1.0 and < 17.1.3
-
Verify ASM or Advanced WAF module is provisionedRun `tmsh list /sys provision` and check for asm or apm (for Advanced WAF) provision level set to nominal or dedicatedAffected if ASM or Advanced WAF module is provisioned (any level)
-
Identify virtual servers with security policiesRun `tmsh list /ltm virtual` and for each virtual server check if a security policy is assigned via `tmsh list /ltm virtual <name>`, looking for the `security-nat-policy` or `policy` field referencing an ASM/Advanced WAF policyAffected if Any virtual server has an ASM or Advanced WAF security policy attached
-
Confirm bd process is runningRun `bigstart status bd` or `ps aux | grep bd` to check if the background daemon process is activeAffected if The bd process is running on a system meeting the above version and configuration conditions
System is affected if running BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM version 17.1.0 through 17.1.2 with a security policy configured on any virtual server, regardless of bd process status (the DoS would cause bd to terminate).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.1.3
Apply the vendor patch when available. Until then, assess the risk exposure based on whether affected virtual servers with security policies are exposed to untrusted networks.
17.1.3 or later
- Identify all BIG-IP devices running BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM versions 17.1.0 through 17.1.2
- Obtain BIG-IP version 17.1.3 or later from F5 Networks download portal
- Review F5 upgrade documentation and release notes for 17.1.3
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Perform a complete configuration backup of the BIG-IP device
- Upgrade BIG-IP to version 17.1.3 or later following F5 recommended upgrade procedures
- After upgrade, verify the bd process is running and security policies are functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-22548 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-22548 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data