CVE-2026-23531
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to version 3.21.0, in ClearCodec, when `glyphData` is present, `clear_decompress` calls `freerdp_image_copy_no_overlap` without validating the destination rectangle, allowing an out-of-bounds read/write via crafted RDPGFX surface updates. A malicious server can trigger a client‑side heap buffer overflow, causing a crash (DoS) and potential heap corruption with code‑execution risk depending on allocator behavior and surrounding heap layout. Version 3.21.0 contains a patch for the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFreeRDP versions prior to 3.21.0 contain a heap buffer overflow in ClearCodec's clear_decompress function. When glyphData is present, the function calls freerdp_image_copy_no_overlap without validating the destination rectangle, allowing a malicious RDP server to trigger out-of-bounds read/write via crafted RDPGFX surface updates, leading to potential code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.21.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FreeRDP client versionRun `freerdp-version` or `xfreerdp -version` to obtain the installed FreeRDP client version. Alternatively, check the package manager (dpkg -l freerdp or rpm -qi freerdp) for the installed version.Affected if The installed version is less than 3.21.0 (e.g., 3.0.0, 3.16.0, 2.x series)
-
Verify ClearCodec module presenceCheck for the presence of the ClearCodec plugin in the FreeRDP installation directory, typically found in /usr/lib/freerdp/ or /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/freerdp/ as libclearcodec.so or similar.Affected if The ClearCodec library file exists in the FreeRDP plugins directory on a vulnerable version
-
Confirm RDP session uses ClearCodec decodingInspect RDP connection logs or traffic captures to determine if the server advertises and the client uses the ClearCodec (CLRCAP) codec for bitmap decompression during the session.Affected if The RDP session successfully negotiates and uses ClearCodec for remote graphics decoding
-
Check for glyphData in surface updatesEnable debug logging in FreeRDP (via /log:debug) and examine logs for RDPGFX surface updates containing glyphData fields being processed by the clear_decompress function.Affected if The client processes RDPGFX surface updates with glyphData present on a vulnerable version
You are affected if your FreeRDP client version is below 3.21.0 AND the ClearCodec decoder is present and used during RDP sessions, as the heap buffer overflow requires glyphData in crafted surface updates to trigger.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.21.0
Upgrade FreeRDP to version 3.21.0 or later. Until then, limit RDP connections to trusted servers only, as this is a client-side vulnerability exploitable by malicious servers.
3.21.0
- Identify the current FreeRDP version installed in your environment
- Upgrade FreeRDP to version 3.21.0 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23531 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- github.com
- github.com
- github.com
- github.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23531 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data