CVE-2026-23532
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to version 3.21.0, a client-side heap buffer overflow occurs in the FreeRDP client’s `gdi_SurfaceToSurface` path due to a mismatch between destination rectangle clamping and the actual copy size. A malicious server can trigger a client‑side heap buffer overflow, causing a crash (DoS) and potential heap corruption with code‑execution risk depending on allocator behavior and surrounding heap layout. Version 3.21.0 contains a patch for the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFreeRDP client contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the gdi_SurfaceToSurface function. The flaw stems from a mismatch between destination rectangle clamping logic and the actual memory copy size, allowing a malicious RDP server to write beyond allocated heap buffers on connected clients. This can cause denial of service via crash and potentially enable heap corruption leading to code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.21.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if FreeRDP is installedRun 'which xfreerdp' or 'which freerdp' to locate the client binary, or use your system's package manager to list installed packages containing 'freerdp'Affected if FreeRDP client is not found on the system (not affected)
-
Determine the installed FreeRDP versionRun 'xfreerdp --version' or 'freerdp-version' to display the version number, or query your package manager (dpkg -l | grep freerdp or rpm -qi freerdp)Affected if No version output can be obtained (cannot confirm status)
-
Compare your version against the affected rangeParse the version number from step 2 and compare it to 3.21.0 using semantic versioning (for example, 3.0.0, 3.16.0, or 3.20.0 would be less than 3.21.0)Affected if The installed version is less than 3.21.0 (for example, 3.20.0, 3.0.0, 2.x.x)
-
Identify FreeRDP library usageCheck if applications link against libfreerdp by running 'ldconfig -p | grep freerdp' or examining specific applications that provide RDP client functionalityAffected if Any application linking to a FreeRDP library version below 3.21.0 is potentially affected
You are affected if any installed FreeRDP client or library version is below 3.21.0 and you use it to connect to RDP servers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.21.0
Upgrade FreeRDP clients to version 3.21.0 or later. Until patched, restrict RDP connections to trusted servers only to avoid malicious server-side exploitation.
3.21.0
- Check current FreeRDP version using 'freerdp-version' or 'xfreerdp /version'
- Upgrade FreeRDP to version 3.21.0 or later using your system's package manager (e.g., 'apt-get update && apt-get install freerdp' for Debian/Ubuntu, or 'yum/dnf update freerdp' for RHEL/CentOS)
- If building from source, clone the FreeRDP repository and checkout version 3.21.0 or later, then compile and install
- Verify the installed version is 3.21.0 or higher using 'freerdp-version' or 'xfreerdp /version'
- Restart any running FreeRDP sessions to ensure the updated version is being used
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-23532 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- github.com
- github.com
- github.com
- github.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-23532 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data