CVE-2026-25037
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by configuring a maliciously crafted LCD state which is later processed during system setup, enabling remote code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn OS command injection vulnerability in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior allows authenticated attackers to achieve remote code execution by submitting a maliciously crafted LCD state configuration that gets processed during system setup without proper input sanitization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.12.1<= 1.12.1<= 1.12.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed XWEB Pro firmware versionAccess the device web interface or check system information page for the firmware version number. Common paths include /status, /about, or the main dashboard showing system details.Affected if The displayed version is 1.12.1 or any version number lower than 1.12.1 (e.g., 1.12.0, 1.11.x, 1.10.x).
-
Locate the LCD state configuration settingNavigate to the system setup or configuration section of the XWEB Pro web interface. Look for LCD-related settings, display configuration, or state parameters under the setup or initialization screens.Affected if The LCD state configuration option exists in the interface and is accessible within the setup workflow.
-
Verify authenticated access to setup functionalityLog into the XWEB Pro device with valid credentials and confirm whether the setup or configuration pages remain accessible after initial setup completion.Affected if An authenticated user can access the system setup or configuration features where the LCD state parameter is processed.
-
Check for input validation on configuration parametersInspect any LCD state or similar configuration parameters submitted during setup. Determine if the interface accepts special characters or command operators in these fields.Affected if The application accepts and processes raw input without apparent sanitization of shell metacharacters in the LCD state configuration field.
You are affected if your Copeland XWEB Pro device runs firmware version 1.12.1 or lower AND the LCD state configuration feature is accessible to authenticated users without proper input sanitization in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and sanitization on the LCD state parameter before passing it to system commands, and apply the principle of least privilege to the user account used for setup operations.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25037 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25037 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data