Swtchenergy.comApplication · Swtchenergy

CVE-2026-25113

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The WebSocket API implementation lacks rate limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unlimited authentication attempts. This enables attackers to perform brute-force attacks to guess credentials and conduct denial-of-service attacks by flooding the system with requests that can suppress or mis-route legitimate EV charger telemetry data.

MitigationImplement rate limiting on WebSocket authentication endpoints using techniques such as token bucket or sliding window algorithms to restrict the number of authentication attempts per time period.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Swtchenergy.comApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify WebSocket API endpoint exposure
    Locate and confirm accessible WebSocket endpoints used for the service. This typically involves reviewing API documentation, checking client-side code for WebSocket connection URLs, or probing common WebSocket paths (ws:// or wss://).
    Affected if WebSocket endpoints are publicly accessible without additional network restrictions.
  2. Verify rate limiting configuration on authentication endpoints
    Review the WebSocket server configuration or API gateway settings to determine if rate limiting is explicitly defined for authentication-related WebSocket endpoints. Check configuration files, middleware settings, or API management solutions for rate limit rules.
    Affected if No rate limiting rules are defined or configured for WebSocket authentication endpoints.
  3. Inspect authentication attempt logs
    Examine WebSocket server logs, authentication logs, or security event logs for patterns of repeated authentication attempts from the same source. Look for rapid successive connection attempts or credential validation requests.
    Affected if Logs show repeated authentication attempts without throttling or blocks, indicating no protection against brute-force attacks.
  4. Test authentication endpoint behavior under load
    Send multiple WebSocket authentication requests in quick succession from a test client to observe whether the server imposes any limits on request frequency.
    Affected if The server accepts unlimited authentication attempts without returning rate limit errors or blocking the client.

A user is affected if their WebSocket authentication endpoints accept unlimited connection attempts without rate limiting configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement rate limiting on WebSocket authentication endpoints using techniques such as token bucket or sliding window algorithms to restrict the number of authentication attempts per time period.

Fix this in Swtchenergy.com Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25113 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25113 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data