CVE-2026-25586
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSandboxJS is a JavaScript sandboxing library. Prior to 0.8.29, a sandbox escape is possible by shadowing hasOwnProperty on a sandbox object, which disables prototype whitelist enforcement in the property-access path. This permits direct access to __proto__ and other blocked prototype properties, enabling host Object.prototype pollution and persistent cross-sandbox impact. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.29.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSandboxJS versions before 0.8.29 contain a sandbox escape vulnerability where attackers can shadow the hasOwnProperty method on sandbox objects. This shadowing disables the prototype whitelist enforcement in the property-access path, allowing direct access to __proto__ and other blocked prototype properties. The flaw enables host Object.prototype pollution and creates persistent cross-sandbox impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.8.29CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed SandboxJS versionRun `npm list sandboxjs` or check package.json dependencies for the sandboxjs version numberAffected if The installed version is below 0.8.29 (e.g., 0.8.28, 0.8.0, etc.)
-
Identify sandbox object instantiationSearch codebase for imports of SandboxJS and instantiation calls such as `new Sandbox()`, `createSandbox()`, or similar sandbox constructor patternsAffected if Code creates sandbox instances using affected versions of SandboxJS below 0.8.29
-
Locate property access on sandboxed objectsReview sandbox configuration and usage code for patterns where sandbox objects are accessed using bracket notation or dot notation (e.g., `sandbox[key]`, `sandbox.prop`)Affected if Sandboxed code accesses object properties through dynamic property access patterns that could trigger the hasOwnProperty check path
-
Detect hasOwnProperty shadowing attemptsReview sandboxed user code for assignments to `hasOwnProperty` on sandbox objects or any code that overrides this method (e.g., `sandbox.hasOwnProperty = function(){}`)Affected if Any code within the sandbox assigns or overrides the hasOwnProperty method on sandbox objects
-
Inspect for prototype pollution indicatorsExamine runtime sandbox state or logs for unexpected modifications to Object.prototype, or check if `__proto__`, `constructor`, or other prototype properties are accessible from within the sandboxAffected if Prototype properties (__proto__, constructor) are accessible or Object.prototype shows unexpected modifications after sandbox execution
A user is affected if their installed SandboxJS version is below 0.8.29 AND their sandboxes execute code that performs property access on sandbox objects, particularly if hasOwnProperty could be shadowed or prototype properties are accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.8.29
Upgrade to SandboxJS version 0.8.29 or later to apply the security fix. Review existing sandboxes for any signs of prototype pollution as the CVSS 10 indicates complete compromise.
sandboxjs version 0.8.29
- 1. Identify all dependencies that include the 'sandboxjs' package in your project
- 2. Run 'npm list sandboxjs' or check your package.json to confirm the current version
- 3. Update sandboxjs to version 0.8.29 or later using 'npm install [email protected]' or 'npm update sandboxjs'
- 4. Test your application thoroughly to ensure the sandbox functionality works correctly after the upgrade
- 5. Rebuild and redeploy all affected services
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25586 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25586 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data