CVE-2026-43898
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSandboxJS is a JavaScript sandboxing library. Prior to 0.9.6, sandbox-defined functions expose Function.caller, allowing sandboxed code to recover the internal LispType.Call runtime callback. That callback can then be invoked with attacker-controlled fake context and obj values to extract blocked host statics, recover the real host Function constructor, and execute arbitrary host JavaScript. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSandboxJS prior to 0.9.6 has a sandbox escape vulnerability where sandbox-defined functions expose Function.caller, allowing malicious sandboxed code to recover the internal LispType.Call runtime callback. This callback can be invoked with attacker-controlled context and obj values to extract blocked host statics, recover the real host Function constructor, and achieve arbitrary host JavaScript execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.9.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SandboxJS installation and versionCheck your package.json, package-lock.json, or node_modules for the installed version of sandboxjs (may be listed as 'sandboxjs', '@nyariv/sandboxjs', or similar). Compare this version against the vulnerable range: versions prior to 0.9.6 are affected.Affected if The installed version is lower than 0.9.6 (e.g., 0.9.5, 0.9.0, etc.)
-
Determine if sandbox-defined functions are usedSearch your codebase for patterns where sandbox-defined functions are created or where sandbox code defines functions that could access Function.caller. Look for code that executes untrusted JavaScript within the sandbox.Affected if Your application executes untrusted JavaScript in SandboxJS and that code can define or call functions that access Function.caller
-
Verify Function.caller is accessible from sandboxed codeRun a test with a sandboxed function that attempts to access its own caller property (e.g., (function(){ return arguments.callee.caller; })()). Evaluate this inside the sandbox context and observe whether the internal LispType.Call callback is exposed.Affected if Sandboxed functions can access Function.caller and recover the internal LispType.Call runtime callback, enabling further privilege escalation
You are affected if your environment runs SandboxJS version lower than 0.9.6 and executes untrusted code that can define or call functions accessing Function.caller within the sandbox context.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.9.6
Upgrade to SandboxJS version 0.9.6 or later to obtain the patch that removes Function.caller exposure of the internal LispType.Call callback.
0.9.6
- Check the current version of sandboxjs in your project by running `npm list sandboxjs` or checking package.json
- Update sandboxjs to version 0.9.6 by running `npm install [email protected]` (or `yarn add [email protected]` / `pnpm add [email protected]`)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running `npm list sandboxjs` and confirming version 0.9.6 is installed
- Test your application to ensure the sandbox functionality still works correctly with the updated library
- Rebuild and redeploy any services that depend on sandboxjs
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43898 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43898 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data