CVE-2026-25656
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SINEC NMS (All versions < V4.0 SP3), User Management Component (UMC) (All versions < V2.15.2.1). The affected application permits improper modification of a configuration file by a low-privileged user. This could allow an attacker to load malicious DLLs, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges.(ZDI-CAN-28108)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability allows low-privileged users to improperly modify configuration files in SINEC NMS and User Management Component (UMC). This enables DLL hijacking, where an attacker can inject a malicious DLL that gets loaded by the application, resulting in arbitrary code execution with SYSTEM privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions< 2.15.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Siemens SINEC NMS is installedCheck common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Siemens\SINEC\NMS or C:\Program Files (x86)\Siemens\SINEC\NMS. Also search the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\SINEC NMS for installation paths.Affected if SINEC NMS is found on the system in any version (all versions are affected per CVE).
-
Identify if Siemens User Management Component (UMC) is installedCheck common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Siemens\User Management Component or C:\Program Files (x86)\Siemens\User Management Component. Also search the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\UMC for installation paths.Affected if UMC is found with a version lower than 2.15.2.1.
-
Check UMC versionLocate the UMC installation directory and check for a version file (typically version.dll, version.txt, or in the About dialog accessible from the application). Compare the installed version against the affected range: versions prior to 2.15.2.1 are vulnerable.Affected if Installed UMC version is less than 2.15.2.1.
-
Verify configuration file permissionsNavigate to the SINEC NMS or UMC configuration directory (commonly found in the installation folder under config or conf subdirectory). Right-click configuration files (XML, JSON, INI, or config files) and view Properties > Security to check write permissions for non-administrator users.Affected if Configuration files are writable by standard users or low-privileged accounts.
-
Inspect for suspicious DLL files in application directoriesScan the SINEC NMS and UMC installation directories for unknown or recently added DLL files that may indicate DLL hijacking attempts. Pay attention to DLLs located in the same directory as executable files.Affected if Unexpected or unauthorized DLL files are present in the application directories.
A system is affected if SINEC NMS of any version or UMC version lower than 2.15.2.1 is installed AND low-privileged users have write access to application configuration files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.15.2.1
Upgrade SINEC NMS to version V4.0 SP3 or later and UMC to version V2.15.2.1 or later. Verify configuration file integrity post-upgrade.
SINEC NMS: V4.0 SP3 or later; User Management Component (UMC): V2.15.2.1 or later
- Identify the currently installed versions of SINEC NMS and User Management Component (UMC)
- Verify the installed versions are below the fixed releases (SINEC NMS < V4.0 SP3, UMC < V2.15.2.1)
- Obtain the fixed versions from Siemens (SINEC NMS V4.0 SP3 or later, UMC V2.15.2.1 or later)
- Plan and schedule the upgrade following Siemens documentation and change management procedures
- Apply the upgrade to SINEC NMS and/or User Management Component
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,792.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25656 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data