CVE-2026-25751
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. An information disclosure vulnerability in FUXA allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive administrative database credentials. Exploitation allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to obtain the full system configuration, including administrative credentials for the InfluxDB database. Possession of these credentials may allow an attacker to authenticate directly to the database service, enabling them to read, modify, or delete all historical process data, or perform a Denial of Service by corrupting the database. This affects FUXA through version 1.2.9. This issue has been patched in FUXA version 1.2.10.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFUXA versions 1.2.9 and earlier contain an unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability that exposes InfluxDB database administrative credentials through the system configuration. An unauthenticated remote attacker can directly retrieve these credentials without any authentication, enabling full database access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.2.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed FUXA versionLocate the FUXA installation and check the version number in package.json, version file, or about page in the web UI. FUXA typically stores version info in the root directory or can be viewed through the application interface.Affected if The installed version is 1.2.9 or earlier (any version below 1.2.10)
-
Confirm InfluxDB integration is configuredCheck the FUXA configuration files (typically in the settings or config directory) for InfluxDB connection settings. Look for influxdb, database, or similar configuration sections that define InfluxDB host, port, username, and password fields.Affected if InfluxDB is configured and connected to FUXA - the vulnerability only exposes InfluxDB credentials when this integration exists
-
Verify web interface accessibilityAttempt to access the FUXA web interface over HTTP/HTTPS from a browser or curl command without providing any authentication credentials.Affected if The web interface is reachable without authentication - this is required for an unauthenticated attacker to exploit the flaw
-
Check for credential exposure in configuration endpointInspect any API endpoint that returns system configuration data (commonly /api/settings, /api/config, or similar) without authentication. Use a tool like curl or browser developer tools to examine if InfluxDB credentials are returned in plain text.Affected if Configuration API responses contain InfluxDB username and password in plaintext or easily decoded format without requiring authentication
You are affected if FUXA version is below 1.2.10 AND InfluxDB is configured AND the web interface is accessible without authentication, allowing any remote user to retrieve database credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.2.10
Upgrade FUXA to version 1.2.10 or later to patch the vulnerability. Until patched, network access to FUXA should be restricted and InfluxDB credentials should be rotated.
FUXA version 1.2.10
- 1. Back up the current FUXA installation directory and configuration files before proceeding
- 2. Stop the FUXA service if it is currently running
- 3. Download FUXA version 1.2.10 from the official GitHub repository releases
- 4. Replace the existing FUXA installation files with the new version 1.2.10 files
- 5. Restart the FUXA service
- 6. Verify the application is running correctly and accessible
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is patched by checking that authentication is now required for accessing sensitive endpoints
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-25751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-25751 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data