CVE-2026-26130
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAllocation of resources without limits or throttling in ASP.NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceASP.NET Core is vulnerable to a network denial-of-service attack due to insufficient resource allocation limits or throttling. An unauthenticated attacker can consume excessive resources by sending requests that trigger unbounded allocation, potentially exhausting server resources and making the application unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.25>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.14>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed ASP.NET Core runtime versionRun `dotnet --list-runtimes` or check the Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime entry in your deploymentAffected if The runtime version falls within 8.0.0-8.0.24, 9.0.0-9.0.13, or 10.0.0-10.0.3
-
Verify if rate-limiting middleware is registeredInspect your Startup.cs or Program.cs for calls to `app.UseRateLimiter()` or custom throttling middlewareAffected if No rate-limiting middleware is configured and the ASP.NET Core version is in the affected range
-
Check Kestrel server limit configurationReview your appsettings.json or Program.cs for Kestrel endpoint configuration, specifically looking for any Limit or MaxConnections settingsAffected if Kestrel has no explicit connection or request limits configured and the version is affected
-
Confirm absence of custom request throttlingSearch project code for any custom logic that constrains requests per client (e.g., per-IP limits, token bucket implementations)Affected if No custom or built-in throttling mechanism exists and the version is vulnerable
You are affected if your ASP.NET Core runtime version is 8.0.0-8.0.24, 9.0.0-9.0.13, or 10.0.0-10.0.3 AND no request throttling, connection limits, or resource quotas are configured in your application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.0.259.0.1410.0.4
Implement request throttling, connection limits, and resource quotas in ASP.NET Core using built-in rate limiting middleware or custom middleware to restrict resource consumption per client.
Upgrade to .NET 8.0.25+, .NET 9.0.14+, or .NET 10.0.4+ depending on your major version
- Identify your current ASP.NET Core version by checking the .csproj file or running dotnet --version
- For .NET 8.x projects: Update the Microsoft.AspNetCore.App framework reference or NuGet packages to version 8.0.25 or later
- For .NET 9.x projects: Update the Microsoft.AspNetCore.App framework reference or NuGet packages to version 9.0.14 or later
- For .NET 10.x projects: Update the Microsoft.AspNetCore.App framework reference or NuGet packages to version 10.0.4 or later
- After updating, run dotnet restore and dotnet build to verify dependencies resolve correctly
- Run existing unit and integration tests to verify application functionality is preserved
- Deploy to a staging environment and perform load testing to verify the resource limiting fix works as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-26130 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- msrc.microsoft.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-26130 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data