CVE-2026-27121
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsvelte performance oriented web framework. Versions of svelte prior to 5.51.5 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) during server-side rendering. When using spread syntax to render attributes from untrusted data, event handler properties are included in the rendered HTML output. If an application spreads user-controlled or external data as element attributes, an attacker can inject malicious event handlers that execute in victims' browsers. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.51.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSvelte versions before 5.51.5 are vulnerable to XSS during server-side rendering when using spread syntax with untrusted data. The framework incorrectly includes event handler properties (like onclick, onerror) in the rendered HTML output, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts that execute in victims' browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.51.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Svelte versionRun 'npm list svelte' or check package.json for the svelte dependency version numberAffected if The version is less than 5.51.5
-
Confirm SSR is in useSearch for server-side rendering configuration: check for 'export const ssr = true' in svelte.config.js, or presence of @sveltejs/kit with server-side load functions, or usage of server.js/node server entry pointsAffected if SSR is enabled and the application renders HTML server-side
-
Locate spread syntax usage in SSR-rendered componentsSearch codebase for JSX-like spread syntax in .svelte files: look for '{...props}' or '{...data}' patterns, especially in components that receive external inputAffected if Spread syntax is used to pass data to components that are rendered server-side
-
Identify untrusted data in spread propsReview the data being spread: check if props include data from HTTP requests, URL parameters, cookies, databases with user content, or API responsesAffected if Untrusted or user-controlled data is passed via spread syntax to components during SSR
-
Verify event handler attributes in SSR outputRender a test page with spread props containing 'onclick', 'onerror', or similar event handler names and inspect the generated HTML server-side output (curl the endpoint or view page source)Affected if Event handler attributes like onclick or onerror appear in the raw HTML response from the server
You are affected if running Svelte version below 5.51.5, using SSR, and spreading untrusted data to components with the spread operator.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.51.5
Upgrade to Svelte 5.51.5 or later. Review code that uses spread syntax with user-controlled or external data during SSR and ensure proper sanitization before the upgrade.
Svelte 5.51.5
- Identify your current Svelte version by checking package.json or running 'npm list svelte'
- Update your package.json to specify [email protected]
- Run 'npm install' or 'npm update' to install the fixed version
- Verify the installation by checking that the Svelte version is now 5.51.5
- Test your application thoroughly, especially any code using spread syntax with untrusted data during server-side rendering
- Ensure your build completes successfully and all existing tests pass
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27121 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27121 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data