CVE-2026-27122
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsvelte performance oriented web framework. Prior to 5.51.5, when using <svelte:element this={tag}> in server-side rendering, the provided tag name is not validated or sanitized before being emitted into the HTML output. If the tag string contains unexpected characters, it can result in HTML injection in the SSR output. Client-side rendering is not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.51.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Svelte versions prior to 5.51.5, the <svelte:element this={tag}> component does not validate or sanitize the tag name parameter during server-side rendering. An attacker who controls the tag string value can inject arbitrary HTML into the SSR output by including unexpected characters (e.g., breaking out of the attribute context). Client-side rendering is unaffected. The fix is available in version 5.51.5.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.51.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Svelte versionRun 'npm list svelte' or inspect node_modules/svelte/package.json to find the installed version number.Affected if The installed Svelte version is lower than 5.51.5.
-
Confirm server-side rendering is in useReview your application configuration and code to determine if SSR (server-side rendering) is enabled. Check for SSR frameworks, server entry points, or configuration files that enable SSR.Affected if SSR is enabled and Svelte is rendering components on the server.
-
Search for vulnerable component usageSearch your codebase for instances of <svelte:element this={...}> syntax. Inspect each usage to see what values are passed to the 'this' attribute.Affected if The component <svelte:element this={tag}> is used in your codebase.
-
Inspect tag parameter source and validationFor each usage of <svelte:element this={tag}>, trace where the tag value originates. Determine if it comes from user input, external data, or untrusted sources. Check if any validation or sanitization is applied before passing to the component.Affected if The tag parameter accepts values from untrusted input without validation or allowlist filtering.
You are affected if your Svelte version is below 5.51.5, you use SSR, and you use <svelte:element this={tag}> with unvalidated tag values from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.51.5
Upgrade Svelte to version 5.51.5 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, audit all uses of <svelte:element this={tag}> in SSR contexts and implement allowlist-based validation on the tag name input before passing it to the component.
Svelte 5.51.5
- Identify all projects using Svelte version less than 5.51.5
- Update the Svelte dependency in package.json to version 5.51.5 (or latest patch in the 5.x line)
- Run 'npm install' or 'yarn install' to update the dependency
- Verify the installed Svelte version is 5.51.5 or higher using 'npm list svelte' or 'yarn list svelte'
- Test the application focusing on server-side rendering functionality, particularly any usage of <svelte:element this={tag}>
- Ensure SSR output does not contain unexpected HTML tags or injection artifacts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27122 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27122 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data