CVE-2026-27855
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDovecot OTP authentication is vulnerable to replay attack under specific conditions. If auth cache is enabled, and username is altered in passdb, then OTP credentials can be cached so that same OTP reply is valid. An attacker able to observe an OTP exchange is able to log in as the user. If authentication happens over unsecure connection, switch to SCRAM protocol. Alternatively ensure the communcations are secured, and if possible switch to OAUTH2 or SCRAM. No publicly available exploits are known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDovecot OTP authentication is vulnerable to replay attacks when auth caching is enabled and the username is modified in the passdb. Under these conditions, OTP credentials can be improperly cached, allowing the same OTP reply to be reused. An attacker who observes an OTP exchange can replay the credentials to authenticate as the user.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.3<= 2.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your installed Dovecot versionRun 'dovecot --version' or check the package manager for the installed dovecot package versionAffected if The version is less than 2.4.3 for standard Dovecot, or 2.3.0 or earlier for Open Xchange Dovecot
-
Verify if auth caching is enabledInspect your dovecot configuration files (typically in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/ or dovecot.conf) for 'auth_cache_size', 'auth_cache_ttl', or 'auth_cache_negative_ttl' settingsAffected if Auth caching is enabled with any non-zero TTL value (auth_cache_size is set and TTL values are configured)
-
Confirm OTP authentication is in useCheck your passdb configuration in dovecot.conf or 10-auth.conf for 'otp', 'otps', or 'digests' authentication mechanisms, and verify the auth scheme includes OTP-based methodsAffected if OTP, OTPS, or digest-based authentication mechanisms are configured in the authentication stack
-
Check for username modification in passdbReview your passdb configuration (in 10-passdb.conf or auth-passdb.ext) for any 'user' filter, 'username' transformation, or passdb rewrite rules that modify the username between authentication stagesAffected if The passdb configuration contains username filtering, modification, or rewrite rules that alter the username from what the client sent to what is looked up in the backend
-
Determine if OTP credentials are being cachedCheck if auth caching applies to the OTP authentication path by examining whether 'auth_cache_ttl' or 'auth_cache_negative_ttl' are set while OTP is enabled in the passdbAffected if Auth caching is active (non-zero TTL) AND OTP authentication is configured in the passdb
You are affected if you run a vulnerable Dovecot version with auth caching enabled, use OTP authentication, and have username modification rules in your passdb configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.3
Switch to SCRAM or OAUTH2 protocols and ensure all authentication communications are secured over TLS. Disable auth caching for OTP authentication or ensure usernames remain consistent in the passdb.
Dovecot 2.4.3 or later (or Dovecot 2.3.1+ on the 2.3.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current installed Dovecot version using 'dovecot --version' or checking the package manager
- 2. Back up current Dovecot configuration files in /etc/dovecot/ and related directories
- 3. For systems using package managers (apt/yum/dnf), update to the latest available Dovecot package
- 4. Verify the upgraded version is 2.4.3 or later (or 2.3.1+ if staying on the 2.3.x branch)
- 5. Review and test authentication configuration, especially OTP-related settings
- 6. Consider disabling auth cache for OTP authentication if not needed, or ensure username consistency in passdb
- 7. Restart Dovecot service after upgrade: 'systemctl restart dovecot'
- 8. Verify the service is running correctly: 'systemctl status dovecot'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27855 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data