CVE-2026-27859
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA mail message containing excessive amount of RFC 2231 MIME parameters causes LMTP to use too much CPU. A suitably formatted mail message causes mail delivery process to consume large amounts of CPU time. Use MTA capabilities to limit RFC 2231 MIME parameters in mail messages, or upgrade to fixed version where the processing is limited. No publicly available exploits are known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in LMTP (Local Mail Transfer Protocol) allows specially crafted mail messages containing excessive RFC 2231 MIME parameters to cause the mail delivery process to consume disproportionate CPU resources, resulting in potential denial of service. The issue stems from lack of input limits on MIME parameter parsing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.3< 3.0.5>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Dovecot versionRun 'dovecot --version' or check the package manager (e.g., 'rpm -q dovecot' or 'dpkg -l dovecot')Affected if The version is less than 2.4.3, or between 3.0.0 and 3.0.4, or between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3
-
Confirm LMTP service is enabledCheck dovecot configuration for 'protocol lmtp' in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/ or run 'dovecot -n' to see enabled protocolsAffected if LMTP protocol is listed among enabled services in the Dovecot configuration
-
Check if LMTP is actively listening or configured for mail deliveryLook for 'service lmtp' entries in dovecot.conf or check if LMTP is bound to a socket or port used for local mail deliveryAffected if LMTP is configured and active as a delivery agent for incoming mail
-
Verify MTA integration with Dovecot LMTPInspect MTA configuration (Postfix, Exim, or Sendmail) for 'lmtp' transport or socket paths pointing to Dovecot LMTPAffected if The MTA is configured to deliver mail via Dovecot LMTP, exposing the vulnerability to incoming messages
You are affected if Dovecot version is in the vulnerable range (<2.4.3, <3.0.5, or >=3.1.0 with <3.1.4) AND LMTP is enabled as a mail delivery protocol.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.33.0.53.1.4
Implement RFC 2231 MIME parameter limits via MTA configuration, or upgrade to the vendor's patched version that includes built-in processing limits.
Dovecot 2.4.3 (for 2.x users), Dovecot 3.0.5 (for 3.0.x users), or Dovecot 3.1.4 (for 3.1.x users)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Dovecot version using: dovecot --version
- 2. Determine which release branch you are currently running (2.x, 3.0.x, or 3.1.x)
- 3. For Dovecot 2.x: Upgrade to version 2.4.3 or later
- 4. For Dovecot 3.0.x: Upgrade to version 3.0.5 or later
- 5. For Dovecot 3.1.x: Upgrade to version 3.1.4 or later
- 6. Use your system's package manager to perform the upgrade (e.g., apt-get update && apt-get install dovecot, or yum/dnf update dovecot)
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed: dovecot --version
- 8. Restart the Dovecot service to apply changes: systemctl restart dovecot or service dovecot restart
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-27859 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-27859 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data