CVE-2026-28380
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAny Editor could delete any snapshot, even if they have no access to read or write them.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a broken access control vulnerability where the snapshot deletion function lacks proper authorization checks. An Editor role user can delete any snapshot object via direct object reference, even when they have no read or write permissions to that specific snapshot. The delete operation bypasses permission validation, allowing unauthorized data destruction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.5.0, < 11.6.14>= 12.2.0, < 12.2.8>= 12.3.0, < 12.3.6>= 12.4.0, < 12.4.3= 11.6.14= 12.2.8= 12.3.6= 12.4.3= 13.0.0= 13.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Grafana versionRun 'grafana-cli --version' or 'grafana-server --version', or check the Grafana health API at /api/health. If CLI tools are unavailable, inspect the installed package via your package manager (dpkg, rpm, brew, or docker inspect).Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 8.5.0 and < 11.6.14, >= 12.2.0 and < 12.2.8, >= 12.3.0 and < 12.3.6, >= 12.4.0 and < 12.4.3, or equals exactly 11.6.14, 12.2.8, 12.3.6, 12.4.3, 13.0.0, or 13.0.1.
-
Verify snapshot feature is enabledCheck Grafana configuration files (grafana.ini or custom.ini) for the [snapshots] section. Look for the 'external_enabled' or 'enabled' setting. Alternatively, query the Grafana Configuration API (GET /api/admin/settings) if accessible and check for snapshot-related settings.Affected if Snapshots are enabled (external_enabled = true or enabled = true) in the configuration.
-
Confirm snapshot deletion API is accessibleAttempt a GET request to the snapshot API (such as /api/snapshots or /api/dashboards/snapshots) using an authenticated session with Editor role. Note: This is an observation check only, not an exploitation test. Check Grafana logs or API documentation for endpoint availability.Affected if The snapshot API endpoints are reachable and respond to authenticated requests from Editor role users.
-
Review user permissions on existing snapshotsList all snapshots via the API (GET /api/dashboards/snapshots) and examine the metadata for each snapshot to identify which users or roles have delete permissions assigned. Cross-reference with the Grafana User and Team permissions UI for the dashboard associated with each snapshot.Affected if Snapshots exist in the system where some Editor users have no read or write permissions assigned yet the snapshot deletion API remains accessible to them.
A user is affected if their Grafana version is within the affected ranges listed AND the snapshot feature is enabled, allowing unauthorized deletion of snapshots by Editor users who lack proper permissions on those specific snapshot objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.6.1412.2.812.3.6
Implement and enforce proper authorization checks on all snapshot deletion endpoints to verify the user has appropriate permissions (delete access) before allowing the operation. Consider adopting a deny-by-default permission model.
11.6.14 (or latest 11.x stable; alternatively 12.2.8/12.3.6/12.4.3 or later depending on branch)
- 1. Backup your Grafana configuration and data
- 2. Review Grafana upgrade notes for your target version for any breaking changes
- 3. Upgrade Grafana to version 11.6.14 or later (recommended: latest 11.x stable release)
- 4. Alternatively, upgrade to version 12.2.8, 12.3.6, or 12.4.3 or later depending on your current major version
- 5. After upgrade, verify that Editor role can no longer delete snapshots they don't have access to
- 6. Test snapshot deletion permissions to confirm authorization is properly enforced
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-28380 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-28380 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data