CVE-2026-2950
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImpact: Lodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. The fix for (CVE-2025-13465: https://github.com/lodash/lodash/security/advisories/GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg) only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such as Object.prototype, Number.prototype, and String.prototype. The issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior. Patches: This issue is patched in 4.18.0. Workarounds: None. Upgrade to the patched version.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier contain a prototype pollution vulnerability in _.unset and _.omit functions. The prior fix (CVE-2025-13465) only blocked string key members, allowing attackers to bypass the check using array-wrapped path segments like ['__proto__']. This enables deletion of properties from built-in prototypes (Object.prototype, Number.prototype, String.prototype), though it does not permit overwriting prototype behavior.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0.0, < 4.17.23>= 4.0.0, < 4.17.23>= 4.0.0, < 4.17.23>= 4.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Lodash versionRun 'npm list lodash' or inspect the version field in node_modules/lodash/package.json, or execute require('lodash/package.json').version in Node.jsAffected if Version is 4.0.0 or higher but below 4.17.23
-
Verify vulnerable functions are in useSearch your codebase for usage of _.unset and _.omit methods, for example: _.unset(obj, path), _.omit(obj, path), or their lodash.unset/lodash.omit equivalentsAffected if Codebase contains calls to _.unset or _.omit where the path argument can be influenced by external input
-
Detect array-wrapped path segmentsInspect all _.unset and _.omit calls to identify if any pass array-wrapped segments, such as _.unset(obj, ['key']) or _.omit(obj, ['prop1', 'prop2']) instead of plain string pathsAffected if The vulnerable functions are called with array-wrapped path arguments like [key] rather than plain string keys
-
Confirm input source is untrustedTrace the path argument back to its origin; check if it originates from HTTP request parameters, user uploads, database content, or other external sourcesAffected if The path argument passed to _.unset or _.omit comes from untrusted or user-controlled sources and includes array-wrapped segments
A user is affected if they have Lodash version 4.0.0 to below 4.17.23 AND their code uses _.unset or _.omit with array-wrapped path segments derived from untrusted input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.17.23
Upgrade lodash to version 4.18.0 or later to patch the vulnerability. There are no workarounds; applications using _.unset or _.omit with user-controlled paths are vulnerable.
4.18.0
- Run `npm install lodash@^4.18.0` to upgrade to the patched version
- Verify the upgrade by running `npm list lodash` to confirm version 4.18.0 or higher is installed
- Run your test suite to ensure the upgrade does not break existing functionality
- If using a package-lock.json, consider deleting it and regenerating with `npm install` to ensure clean dependency resolution
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,552.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-2950 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-2950 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data