Crypt\Application · Iamb

CVE-2026-30910

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-03-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.001001 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Crypt::Sodium::XS versions through 0.001000 for Perl has potential integer overflows. Combined aead encryption, combined signature creation, and bin2hex functions do not check that output size will be less than SIZE_MAX, which could lead to integer wraparound causing an undersized output buffer. This can cause a crash in bin2hex and encryption algorithms other than aes256gcm. For aes256gcm encryption and signatures, an undersized buffer could lead to buffer overflow. Encountering this issue is unlikely as the message length would need to be very large. For bin2hex the input size would have to be > SIZE_MAX / 2 For aegis encryption the input size would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 32U For other encryption the input size would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 16U For signatures the input size would need to be > SIZE_MAX - 64U

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Crypt::Sodium::XS Perl library versions through 0.001000 contain integer overflow vulnerabilities in its combined AEAD encryption, signature creation, and bin2hex functions. These functions fail to validate that calculated output sizes won't exceed SIZE_MAX, causing integer wraparound that results in undersized buffers. This leads to crashes in bin2hex and non-aes256gcm encryption, while aes256gcm encryption and signatures could experience buffer overflows when processing messages exceeding SIZE_MAX minus overhead thresholds.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Crypt::Sodium::XS that properly validates buffer sizes before arithmetic operations, or implement application-layer input validation to reject messages exceeding safe size thresholds (SIZE_MAX/2 for bin2hex, SIZE_MAX-32U for aegis, SIZE_MAX-16U for other encryption, SIZE_MAX-64U for signatures).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Crypt\Application
Affected:<= 0.001001

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Crypt::Sodium::XS installation and version
    Run 'perl -MCrypt::Sodium::XS -e "print $Crypt::Sodium::XS::VERSION"' or check via 'cpan -l | grep Crypt::Sodium::XS'
    Affected if Version is 0.001000 or lower, or any version <= 0.001001 per product listing
  2. Verify bin2hex function usage
    Search codebase for calls to bin2hex or 'Crypt::Sodium::XS::bin2hex'
    Affected if bin2hex is used to convert buffers larger than SIZE_MAX/2 (approximately 4GB on 64-bit systems)
  3. Identify AEAD encryption mode in use
    Search for aegis256, aegis128, or other AEAD cipher calls in code using Crypt::Sodium::XS
    Affected if AEGIS encryption is used with messages exceeding SIZE_MAX-32 bytes
  4. Check for non-aes256gcm encryption usage
    Search for secretbox, chacha20poly1305, or other non-GCM encryption calls from the library
    Affected if These encryption modes process messages larger than SIZE_MAX-16 bytes
  5. Detect signature function usage
    Search for sign, signature creation, or related functions from Crypt::Sodium::XS
    Affected if Signature functions process messages exceeding SIZE_MAX-64 bytes

User is affected if Crypt::Sodium::XS version 0.001001 or lower is installed AND any of the vulnerable functions (bin2hex, AEAD encryption, other encryption, or signatures) process messages approaching SIZE_MAX thresholds.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.001001
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Crypt::Sodium::XS that properly validates buffer sizes before arithmetic operations, or implement application-layer input validation to reject messages exceeding safe size thresholds (SIZE_MAX/2 for bin2hex, SIZE_MAX-32U for aegis, SIZE_MAX-16U for other encryption, SIZE_MAX-64U for signatures).

Fix this in Crypt\ Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,900
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-30910 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-30910 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data