CVE-2026-31462
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: prevent immediate PASID reuse case PASID resue could cause interrupt issue when process immediately runs into hw state left by previous process exited with the same PASID, it's possible that page faults are still pending in the IH ring buffer when the process exits and frees up its PASID. To prevent the case, it uses idr cyclic allocator same as kernel pid's. (cherry picked from commit 8f1de51f49be692de137c8525106e0fce2d1912d)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.15, < 6.12.80>= 6.13, < 6.18.21>= 6.19, < 6.19.11= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.12.806.18.216.19.11
Upgrade to Linux kernel 6.12.80+ (for 4.15-6.12.x users), 6.18.21+ (for 6.13-6.18.x users), 6.19.11+ (for 6.19.x users), or 7.1+ (for 7.0 users)
- 1. Identify the current running kernel version using 'uname -r'
- 2. Determine which version range your current kernel falls into from: >= 4.15 and < 6.12.80, >= 6.13 and < 6.18.21, >= 6.19 and < 6.19.11, or = 7.0
- 3. For kernels < 6.12.80: upgrade to kernel version 6.12.80 or later (6.12.x stable)
- 4. For kernels >= 6.13 and < 6.18.21: upgrade to kernel version 6.18.21 or later (6.18.x stable)
- 5. For kernels >= 6.19 and < 6.19.11: upgrade to kernel version 6.19.11 or later (6.19.x stable)
- 6. For kernel 7.0: upgrade to a version beyond 7.0 (such as 7.1 or later stable release)
- 7. Verify the fix commit 14b81abe7bdc25f8097906fc2f91276ffedb2d26 is included in the target kernel by checking the kernel release notes or changelog
- 8. After upgrade, confirm amdgpu module loads correctly and PASID allocation uses cyclic behavior
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31462 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data