CVE-2026-31463
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iomap: fix invalid folio access when i_blkbits differs from I/O granularity Commit aa35dd5cbc06 ("iomap: fix invalid folio access after folio_end_read()") partially addressed invalid folio access for folios without an ifs attached, but it did not handle the case where 1 << inode->i_blkbits matches the folio size but is different from the granularity used for the IO, which means IO can be submitted for less than the full folio for the !ifs case. In this case, the condition: if (*bytes_submitted == folio_len) ctx->cur_folio = NULL; in iomap_read_folio_iter() will not invalidate ctx->cur_folio, and iomap_read_end() will still be called on the folio even though the IO helper owns it and will finish the read on it. Fix this by unconditionally invalidating ctx->cur_folio for the !ifs case.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Linux kernel's iomap subsystem has a race condition where ctx->cur_folio is not properly invalidated when block size (i_blkbits) differs from I/O granularity. When partial I/O completes on a folio without an ifs attached, the condition checking bytes_submitted == folio_len fails to clear cur_folio, causing iomap_read_end() to be called on a folio still owned by the I/O helper, leading to potential use-after-free or invalid memory access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.19, < 6.19.11= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to obtain the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version is 6.19.0 through 6.19.10 (inclusive), or exactly 7.0.0 (i.e., matches >= 6.19, < 6.19.11 or = 7.0)
-
Verify iomap subsystem is presentCheck that the kernel has iomap support by looking for CONFIG_FS_IOMAP in /boot/config-$(uname -r) or /proc/config.gz (if available), or verify /sys/kernel/debug/iomap existsAffected if The iomap subsystem is compiled into the kernel (this is the default for most distributions)
-
Identify iomap source code versionIf the kernel source is available, locate fs/iomap/iterator.c and check the iomap_read_folio_iter() function for the vulnerable code pattern where cur_folio is not cleared in the !ifs (inline fs) case when bytes_submitted == folio_lenAffected if The source code contains the vulnerable pattern where cur_folio invalidation is missing for the !ifs branch after partial I/O completes
-
Check for folio-related I/O errorsMonitor dmesg for kernel warnings or errors related tofolio, iomap, or memory access faults: 'dmesg | grep -i -E "(folio|iomap|use-after-free|invalid memory)"'Affected if The system exhibits symptoms of the race condition such as folio-related panics or memory access violations during file reads
The environment is affected if the running kernel version is 6.19.x where x < 11, or exactly 7.0, and the iomap subsystem is in use performing buffered I/O operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.19.11
Apply the upstream kernel patch that unconditionally invalidates ctx->cur_folio for the !ifs case in iomap_read_folio_iter(). This is a kernel-level fix requiring recompilation and deployment of the patched kernel.
Linux Kernel 6.19.11 or later (for 6.19.x branch); Linux Kernel 7.1 or later (for 7.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
- 2. For systems running 6.19.x (>= 6.19, < 6.19.11): Upgrade to kernel version 6.19.11 or later using your distribution's package manager (e.g., `apt-get install linux-image-6.19.11`, `yum update kernel-6.19.11`, or equivalent)
- 3. For systems running 7.0: Upgrade to kernel version 7.1 or later
- 4. Reboot the system to load the new kernel
- 5. Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version (`uname -r`) and confirming it shows 6.19.11+ or 7.1+
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31463 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31463 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data