CVE-2026-31589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: call ->free_folio() directly in folio_unmap_invalidate() We can only call filemap_free_folio() if we have a reference to (or hold a lock on) the mapping. Otherwise, we've already removed the folio from the mapping so it no longer pins the mapping and the mapping can be removed, causing a use-after-free when accessing mapping->a_ops. Follow the same pattern as __remove_mapping() and load the free_folio function pointer before dropping the lock on the mapping. That lets us make filemap_free_folio() static as this was the only caller outside filemap.c.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLinux kernel memory management use-after-free vulnerability in folio_unmap_invalidate(). The function calls filemap_free_folio() without proper reference to the mapping, allowing the mapping to be removed after the folio is detached, causing a use-after-free when accessing mapping->a_ops. The fix loads the free_folio function pointer before dropping the mapping lock, following the pattern used in __remove_mapping().
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.14, < 6.19.14>= 7.0, < 7.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to see the running kernel versionAffected if The version is >= 6.14 and < 6.19.14, or >= 7.0 and < 7.0.1
-
Verify folio_unmap_invalidate function existsCheck if the function folio_unmap_invalidate exists in the kernel image: 'grep -r folio_unmap_invalidate /boot/System.map-$(uname -r)' or check /proc/kallsyms if availableAffected if The function symbol is present in the kernel, indicating the vulnerable code path exists
-
Confirm memory mapping usage triggers the vulnerable codeThe vulnerability is in the folio_unmap_invalidate function which handles folio unmapping during invalidation. This code path is exercised when using memory-mapped files or page cache operations.Affected if The system uses memory-mapped files (mmap), munmap, or any operations that trigger folio invalidation in the page cache
You are affected if your running kernel version falls within 6.14 to 6.19.13, or 7.0.0, and the system uses memory-mapped file operations that trigger the folio_unmap_invalidate code path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.19.147.0.1
Apply the kernel patch that restructures folio_unmap_invalidate() to load the free_folio function pointer before releasing the mapping lock, preventing the race condition that leads to use-after-free of mapping->a_ops.
Linux Kernel 6.19.14 or 7.0.1 (depending on which major version branch you are on)
- 1. Identify the currently running Linux kernel version using 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version'
- 2. If running kernel >= 6.14 and < 6.19.14, plan to upgrade to kernel version 6.19.14 or later
- 3. If running kernel >= 7.0 and < 7.0.1, plan to upgrade to kernel version 7.0.1 or later
- 4. For distribution-specific kernels (e.g., Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL), check if a point release update is available that includes the fix commit 615d9bb2ccad42f9e21d837431e401db2e471195
- 5. Apply the kernel upgrade through your distribution's standard package management (e.g., 'apt-get dist-upgrade' or 'yum update')
- 6. Reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- 7. Verify the new kernel version is running with 'uname -r'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data