CVE-2026-31668
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seg6: separate dst_cache for input and output paths in seg6 lwtunnel The seg6 lwtunnel uses a single dst_cache per encap route, shared between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). These two paths can perform the post-encap SID lookup in different routing contexts (e.g., ip rules matching on the ingress interface, or VRF table separation). Whichever path runs first populates the cache, and the other reuses it blindly, bypassing its own lookup. Fix this by splitting the cache into cache_input and cache_output, so each path maintains its own cached dst independently.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe seg6 lwtunnel in the Linux kernel uses a single dst_cache shared between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). Since these paths can operate in different routing contexts (e.g., different ingress interfaces or VRF tables), whichever path executes first populates the cache and the other path reuses it blindly, bypassing its own routing lookup. This allows traffic to circumvent IP rules and VRF table separation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.10.1, < 5.10.253>= 5.11, < 5.15.203>= 5.16, < 6.1.169>= 6.2, < 6.6.135>= 6.7, < 6.12.82>= 6.13, < 6.18.23>= 6.19, < 6.19.13= 4.10= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel versionRun `uname -r` to get the running kernel version and compare against affected ranges: 4.10, 4.10.1 to < 5.10.253, 5.11 to < 5.15.203, 5.16 to < 6.1.169, 6.2 to < 6.6.135, 6.7 to < 6.12.82, 6.13 to < 6.18.23, 6.19 to < 6.19.13, and 7.0Affected if The installed kernel version falls within any of the affected version ranges listed in the CVE
-
Verify SEG6 kernel module is loadedRun `lsmod | grep -i seg6` or check if SEG6 is built into the kernel by examining /boot/config-$(uname -r) for CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL or similar SEG6 configuration optionsAffected if The seg6 kernel module is loaded or SEG6 is enabled in the kernel configuration (this is a prerequisite for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Check for active SEG6 tunnels or policiesRun `ip -6 ru show` and `ip -6 seg6 tunnel show` (or `ip -6 sr policy show`) to list any configured IPv6 segment routing tunnels or policiesAffected if There are active SEG6 tunnels or policies configured on the system, indicating the vulnerable code paths may be exercised
-
Check for VRF or multiple routing table usageRun `ip vrf show` or check for multiple routing tables in use via `cat /etc/iproute2/rt_tables` and inspect whether the system uses VRF or policy routing with `ip -6 rule show`Affected if VRF instances or multiple routing contexts (policy routing) are configured, which creates the condition where the shared dst_cache causes routing bypass between different contexts
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable kernel version AND has SEG6 functionality enabled AND uses VRF or multiple routing contexts, allowing the shared dst_cache to cause traffic to bypass routing rules.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.10.2535.15.2036.1.169
Apply the kernel patch that splits the dst_cache into separate cache_input and cache_output structures, ensuring each path maintains its own independent cached destination.
Upgrade to kernel >=6.1.169 (LTS) or >=6.6.135 (latest stable), depending on distribution support
- 1. Identify the current running kernel version using `uname -r`
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade target based on your distribution's kernel packages: for 5.10.x branch upgrade to >=5.10.253, for 5.11-5.15.x upgrade to >=5.15.203, for 5.16-6.1.x upgrade to >=6.1.169, or for 6.2-6.6.x upgrade to >=6.6.135
- 3. For Debian/Ubuntu: Run `apt update && apt list --upgradable | grep linux-image` to see available kernel upgrades, then `apt install linux-image-<version>`
- 4. For RHEL/CentOS: Run `yum check-update` and `yum update kernel`
- 5. For Alpine: Run `apk update` and `apk upgrade linux-lts` or specify the exact version
- 6. After installation, reboot the system to load the patched kernel: `systemctl reboot`
- 7. Verify the fix is applied by checking the kernel version after reboot with `uname -r` and confirming it matches a fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-31668 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-31668 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data