Dynamics 365Application · Microsoft

CVE-2026-32210

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Online) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Online) allows an unauthenticated attacker to induce the Dynamics server to make arbitrary network requests, potentially enabling network spoofing and internal service enumeration.

MitigationSince this is a SaaS (Online) offering, remediation relies on Microsoft's patch deployment. Organizations should monitor Microsoft's security advisories, review Dynamics 365 integrations and connected third-party services for exposure, and implement network segmentation to limit potential impact of SSRF-induced requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dynamics 365Application
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Dynamics 365 Online usage
    Identify whether your organization uses Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Online) by checking your Microsoft 365 admin portal, subscription details, or consulting with your IT/administrative team about your Dynamics deployment type.
    Affected if Any organization using Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Online) is affected since all versions are vulnerable.
  2. Review Dynamics 365 integrations
    Inventory all third-party services, connectors, and external endpoints configured within your Dynamics 365 environment, including Power Automate flows, webhooks, and API connections.
    Affected if The presence of integrated external services creates potential targets for SSRF-induced requests.
  3. Monitor for unexpected outbound requests
    Examine network logs, proxy logs, and firewall traffic for unusual outgoing HTTP/HTTPS requests originating from Dynamics 365 service IP addresses or application servers, particularly to internal or unexpected external endpoints.
    Affected if Unexpected outbound requests from Dynamics 365 services to internal network ranges or unusual external hosts may indicate exploitation attempts.
  4. Audit connector and webhook configurations
    Review all configured connectors, webhooks, and HTTP request steps within Dynamics 365 workflows, Power Apps, and Power Automate for overly permissive or unnecessary external URL allowances.
    Affected if Connectors configured to accept arbitrary URLs or make outbound calls to user-controlled endpoints provide attack surface for SSRF.

If your organization uses Microsoft Dynamics 365 (Online), you are affected by this vulnerability since all versions are impacted, and detection should focus on identifying exposed integrations and monitoring for anomalous outbound requests from Dynamics services.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since this is a SaaS (Online) offering, remediation relies on Microsoft's patch deployment. Organizations should monitor Microsoft's security advisories, review Dynamics 365 integrations and connected third-party services for exposure, and implement network segmentation to limit potential impact of SSRF-induced requests.

Fix this in Dynamics 365 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,620
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,592.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-32210 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-32210 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data