CVE-2026-33701
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation provides OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation and instrumentation libraries for Java. In versions prior to 2.26.1, the RMI instrumentation registered a custom endpoint that deserialized incoming data without applying serialization filters. On JDK version 16 and earlier, an attacker with network access to a JMX or RMI port on an instrumented JVM could exploit this to potentially achieve remote code execution. All three of the following conditions must be true to exploit this vulnerability: First, OpenTelemetry Java instrumentation is attached as a Java agent (`-javaagent`) on Java 16 or earlier. Second, JMX/RMI port has been explicitly configured via `-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port` and is network-reachable. Third, gadget-chain-compatible library is present on the classpath. This results in arbitrary remote code execution with the privileges of the user running the instrumented JVM. For JDK >= 17, no action is required, but upgrading is strongly encouraged. For JDK < 17, upgrade to version 2.26.1 or later. As a workaround, set the system property `-Dotel.instrumentation.rmi.enabled=false` to disable the RMI integration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe RMI instrumentation in OpenTelemetry Java versions prior to 2.26.1 registers a custom endpoint that deserializes incoming data without applying serialization filters. On Java 16 or earlier, an attacker with network access to a configured JMX/RMI port can exploit this to achieve remote code execution if a gadget-chain-compatible library exists on the classpath.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.26.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation versionCheck the version of the opentelemetry-java-instrumentation agent or JAR file in your environment (check build files, lib folder, or runtime classpath for the instrumentation library version)Affected if The installed version is below 2.26.1 (e.g., 2.26.0, 2.25.0, etc.)
-
Determine if RMI instrumentation is enabledCheck for the system property -Dotel.instrumentation.rmi.enabled or look for this property in your application startup scripts, environment variables, or configuration filesAffected if The property is set to true or is not explicitly set to false (default behavior enables RMI instrumentation)
-
Identify the Java runtime versionRun 'java -version' or check the JAVA_HOME environment to determine the JDK/JRE versionAffected if The runtime is Java 16 or earlier (JDK 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, or 16)
-
Check if JMX/RMI ports are exposedReview your application configuration, firewall rules, or network settings for any exposed JMX/RMI listener ports (typically port 1099 or custom RMI ports)Affected if The application has an accessible JMX/RMI port reachable from the network
You are affected if you have OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation version below 2.26.1, RMI instrumentation is enabled (default), Java 16 or earlier is in use, and a JMX/RMI port is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.26.1
Upgrade OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation to version 2.26.1 or later; alternatively, disable the RMI instrumentation by setting `-Dotel.instrumentation.rmi.enabled=false` as a JVM argument.
2.26.1
- Upgrade to OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation version 2.26.1 or later by updating your build configuration (Maven, Gradle, or the -javaagent JAR reference)
- Verify the upgrade by checking that the instrumentation version matches or exceeds 2.26.1
- If immediate upgrade is not possible and JDK < 17 is in use, add the JVM argument `-Dotel.instrumentation.rmi.enabled=false` to disable the vulnerable RMI integration
- Ensure JMX/RMI ports are not network-exposed if possible, as this is a required condition for exploitation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-33701 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-33701 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data