CVE-2026-54704
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation provides OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation and instrumentation libraries for Java. In versions prior to 2.28.0, the JDBC auto-instrumentation may fail to sanitize passwords in SQL CONNECT statements when the password is double-quoted. As a result, clear-text database passwords can be added to trace span attributes and exported to observability backends. This issue has been fixed in version 2.28.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation JDBC auto-instrumentation fails to sanitize passwords in SQL CONNECT statements when the password is double-quoted. This causes clear-text database passwords to be captured in trace span attributes and exported to observability backends, creating a credential exposure risk.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.28.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation agent JARSearch your application deployment for 'opentelemetry-javaagent.jar' or similar OpenTelemetry Java agent files. Check application startup scripts, lib directories, or container images for the agent JAR.Affected if The agent JAR exists in your deployment and its version is below 2.28.0
-
Identify the installed OpenTelemetry Java agent versionRun 'java -jar <path-to-opentelemetry-javaagent.jar> --version' or check the filename/version in the JAR manifest (META-INF/MANIFEST.MF) for the 'Implementation-Version' attribute.Affected if The version is present and less than 2.28.0
-
Confirm JDBC auto-instrumentation is activeReview your application startup arguments for '-javaagent' pointing to the OpenTelemetry agent, and check if JDBC-based database connections are being used. Look for OpenTelemetry logs or tracing output showing JDBC instrumentation loaded.Affected if The agent is attached and JDBC connections are being instrumented (SQL statements appear in traces)
-
Inspect exported trace data for credential exposureExamine your observability backend (Jaeger, Zipkin, OTLP receiver) for recent traces containing SQL CONNECT statements. Search for span attributes containing database connection strings with passwords visible in plain text.Affected if Traces contain SQL statements or connection attributes with unmasked passwords that were exported to your observability backend
Your environment is affected if you use OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation version below 2.28.0 with JDBC auto-instrumentation enabled, and your exported traces contain unredacted database passwords in SQL CONNECT statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.28.0
Upgrade OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation to version 2.28.0 or later to patch the password sanitization failure in JDBC auto-instrumentation.
2.28.0
- 1. Locate the OpenTelemetry Java Instrumentation dependency in your project's build configuration (e.g., pom.xml, build.gradle)
- 2. Update the opentelemetry-java-instrumentation dependency version to 2.28.0 or later
- 3. Rebuild your application to incorporate the updated dependency
- 4. Verify that JDBC connections still function correctly after the upgrade
- 5. Test that SQL CONNECT statements with double-quoted passwords are now properly sanitized and not exposed in trace attributes
- 6. Confirm that your observability backend is not receiving password data in span attributes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-54704 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-54704 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data