CVE-2026-34264
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDuring authorization checks in SAP Human Capital Management for SAP S/4HANA, the system returns specific messages. Due to this, an authenticated user with low privileges could guess and enumerate the content shown, beyond their authorized scope. This leads to disclosure of sensitive information causing a high impact on confidentiality, while integrity and availability are unaffected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSAP HCM for S/4HANA returns specific verbose messages during authorization checks that leak information about sensitive data. An authenticated low-privilege user can enumerate and discover content beyond their authorized scope by analyzing these messages, leading to confidentiality breach.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= s4hcmrxx_100= s4hcmrxx_101= s4hcmrxx_102= sap_hrrxx_600= sap_hrrxx_604= sap_hrrxx_608CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SAP HCM product versionUse SAP transaction codes (such as SM37, SAINT, or SPAM) or check system information to determine the exact version of the Sap Human Capital Management or sap_hrrxx component installed in your systemAffected if The installed version matches one of the following: s4hcmrxx_100, s4hcmrxx_101, s4hcmrxx_102, sap_hrrxx_600, sap_hrrxx_604, or sap_hrrxx_608
-
Verify verbose error message configurationCheck the SAP system profile parameters and security settings related to error message verbosity, typically found in transaction code SU01, SPAD, or system profile settings. Look for settings that control whether authorization failure messages return specific versus generic textAffected if System is configured to return specific or detailed error messages rather than generic authorization failure messages
-
Test authorization error message contentAs a low-privilege authenticated user, attempt to access data or functions outside your authorized scope and capture the exact error message returned. Compare the message content against what a generic authorization failure should returnAffected if Error messages explicitly indicate whether the requested data or object exists (for example, by differentiating between 'no access' versus 'object not found'), revealing sensitive system state information
-
Check for information enumeration patternsSubmit multiple authorization requests for different sensitive objects or records and analyze whether the variation in error messages allows enumeration of what data exists within the system beyond the user's authorized scopeAffected if Distinct error message patterns allow a low-privilege user to discover the existence of sensitive data they should not be able to see
-
Review SAP security notes implementation statusCheck if the relevant SAP security notes for this vulnerability have been applied by reviewing the installed support packages or using transaction code SNOTE to verify patch statusAffected if The specific security notes addressing verbose authorization messages for this CVE have not been applied
Your system is affected if it runs any of the listed SAP HCM versions AND returns specific error messages during authorization failures that reveal whether sensitive data or objects exist, rather than generic messages that hide such information.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataConfigure SAP to return generic error messages during authorization failures rather than specific messages that reveal system state or data existence. Apply relevant SAP security notes.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34264 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34264 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data