CVE-2026-34766
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedElectron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to versions 38.8.6, 39.8.0, 40.7.0, and 41.0.0-beta.8, the select-usb-device event callback did not validate the chosen device ID against the filtered list that was presented to the handler. An app whose handler could be influenced to select a device ID outside the filtered set would grant access to a device that did not match the renderer's requested filters or was listed in exclusionFilters. The WebUSB security blocklist remained enforced regardless, so security-sensitive devices on the blocklist were not affected. The practical impact is limited to apps with unusual device-selection logic. This issue has been patched in versions 38.8.6, 39.8.0, 40.7.0, and 41.0.0-beta.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceElectron's WebUSB API contains a validation bypass in the select-usb-device event callback. Prior to versions 38.8.6, 39.8.0, 40.7.0, and 41.0.0-beta.8, the handler did not validate that the chosen device ID matched the filtered list presented to the renderer, potentially allowing access to devices outside the requested filters or exclusionFilters. The WebUSB blocklist remained enforced.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 38.8.6>= 39.0.0, < 39.8.0>= 40.0.0, < 40.7.0= 41.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Electron versionRun 'electron --version' from command line, check package.json dependencies, or inspect process.versions.electron in the running applicationAffected if The version falls outside 38.8.6+, 39.8.0+, 40.7.0+, or 41.0.0-beta.8+ (i.e., it is below these or exactly 41.0.0)
-
Verify WebUSB API usageSearch codebase for 'navigator.usb' or '@electron/remote' USB module usage in renderer process JavaScriptAffected if WebUSB API is used in the application renderer
-
Identify select-usb-device event handlersSearch for '.on("select-usb-device",' or 'select-usb-device' event listener registrations in the main process codeAffected if A select-usb-device event handler is registered
-
Examine handler device selection logicReview the select-usb-device handler code to determine if it uses deviceId from the event without validating against the filters array provided in the eventAffected if The handler uses event.deviceId without cross-checking event.filters or event.exclusionFilters
You are affected if your Electron version is below the fixed releases AND your application uses WebUSB with a select-usb-device event handler that does not validate selected device IDs against the provided filter list.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped38.8.639.8.040.7.0
Upgrade Electron to version 38.8.6, 39.8.0, 40.7.0, or 41.0.0-beta.8 or later. Applications using unusual device-selection logic should verify their handlers properly validate device IDs against the filtered set.
Electron 38.8.6, 39.8.0, 40.7.0, or 41.0.0-beta.8 (depending on your current major version)
- 1. Identify your current Electron version by checking package.json or running `npm list electron`
- 2. Determine which major version you are currently on (38.x, 39.x, 40.x, or 41.x)
- 3. If on version < 38.8.6, upgrade to version 38.8.6
- 4. If on version >= 39.0.0 and < 39.8.0, upgrade to version 39.8.0
- 5. If on version >= 40.0.0 and < 40.7.0, upgrade to version 40.7.0
- 6. If on version 41.0.0, upgrade to version 41.0.0-beta.8
- 7. Update your package.json with the new version and run `npm install` or `npm update electron`
- 8. Test your application, particularly any WebUSB functionality that uses the select-usb-device event
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-34766 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-34766 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data